Quote:
Originally Posted by ChristopherHall
It's called the benefit of the doubt because I don't know him personally. Do you?
|
Benefit of the doubt does not declare him one way or another...it just denies guilt. You are declaring for him what he must have really thought...same with the pastor. Im just looking at the facts
Quote:
|
Clearly it would be too charged for you. However, I've read quite a bit on black history and America's treatment of the black people. I wouldn't be surprised by it.
|
Oh brother...yes you alone know about America's treatment of blacks and black history. Good grief.
Quote:
|
Obama has to condemn it...but at the same time Obama asked that we understand Jeremiah's generation. Obama claims he never heard it. Again, I give him the benefit of the doubt.
|
No. He does not have to condemn it. And you did not give him the benefit of the doubt....really what you did was implicate him as a liar.
Quote:
|
It's called the benefit of the doubt because I don't know him personally. Do you?
|
No it is not called the benefit of the doubt. Again the benefit of the doubt simply denies one claim...not make up another one for him. You use terms like most likely.....that is not the benefit of the doubt. That takes knowledge to say most likely.....not a guess. The benefit of the doubt would take an accusation and simply say "well I will hold off on judgement until more facts are presented"...You are using very specific terms that imply knowledge. Again, we have the facts, from his own mouth. This was his church and his pastor. I know what my pastor preaches....even if I miss some services I still KNOW what the man preaches and believes. He is Oneness....I know what Oneness teaches. That is HIS theology. Obama denounced the Preachers words as wrong....those are the facts. Obama is running for office. Those are the facts.
Quote:
|
It's called the benefit of the doubt because I don't know him personally. Do you?
|
Polly want a cracker?
Threaded Mode
