Quote:
Originally Posted by GrowingPains
That symbol argument has always been there. Since Victorian times, this was the major distinction, and since those pictures aren't 3-D, that outline is the most ideal. Men don't wear skirts so it's quite noticeable that both genders are represented.
I worry about that sign changing, as we get into a unisex society.
However, this is a desperate argument to support the idea that pants are a cause for disfellowship.
|
Where did anyone say pants were a reason for disfellowship? That sentence brings a subtle inference that someone posted in here that a woman should be disfellowshipped for wearing pants.... that's a little intellectually dishonest.
Why can't people just read what's posted and not assume things?
Threaded Mode
