Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
Baron, can you explain why, for religious purposes, the church is not allowed to define fornication in this case? The plaintiff's attorney, as part of the legal proceeding, seemed to make it an issue how the state defined fornication
|
The church would be able to define fornication, however it appears that even under his definition there were no facts to support his claims, thus truth was not used as a defense.
I think the fact that he deliberately defined it so widely and left the congregation to imagine the worst was a huge mistake.
Threaded Mode
