Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
The church would be able to define fornication, however it appears that even under his definition there were no facts to support his claims, thus truth was not used as a defense.
I think the fact that he deliberately defined it so widely and left the congregation to imagine the worst was a huge mistake.
|
Definitely. In fact had he just came out and said "she was guilty of being in a bikini with the husband of a mutual friend" many members would have said "but that doesn't mean they had sexual relations"
Threaded Mode
