Quote:
Originally Posted by rdp
When it says "not with gold, pearls, or costly apparell." Ughhhh, I think he probably means what he says! Now, be a good little "scholar" & compare that to eating/talking  !!!
|
Still same strategy I see. "Not with" on repeat x 20 even after you yourself have proven that this phrase without context does not give us interpretation. But as you were
For the LAST time... it's not a point of comparing eating and talking. Read that 20 times just to cover your future repeats. What makes the verse right or wrong is not comparing eating or wearing clothes or talking and decide which is most important and therefore has more meaning. DOH! That's exactly everyone's point to you. You attempted to set-up a straw man by suggesting our "rule" was a blanket, and wouldn't work in certain scriptures (
Romans 13 for example). Our reply was a slap on the forehead -- of course not, because that's not our argument. Way to show you lack listening skills! Our point is the word needs context. You agreed after we submitted verses that were OBVIOUS and you agreed. Now quit playing stupid.... at least I think you're playing.
Threaded Mode
