Forced Vaccinations

[ILG]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

I wouldn't think so. If someone is "un-vaccinated" then they are still susceptible to the disease. That is the whole purpose of vaccination... also call immunization. They are immune per the shot so anyone else getting the disease shouldn't have any affect on the immunized.

From what I understand, that isn't true. Apparently, if someone catches the disease fill blown, the immunized are more susceptible.

[Digging4Truth]

Originally Posted by ILG

From what I understand, that isn't true. Apparently, if someone catches the disease fill blown, the immunized are more susceptible.

ANOTHER reason to forego immunization.

[ILG]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

ANOTHER reason to forego immunization.

I don't mean the immunized are more susceptible than the unimmunized. They would be more susceptible than they otherwise would be if they were not around people who had a full blown case, meaning that immunizations provide some protection but not complete protection. So, if there were an outbreak because people were not immunized, the unimmunized would be putting the immunized at greater risk.

[Timmy]

Originally Posted by ILG

From what I understand, that isn't true. Apparently, if someone catches the disease fill blown, the immunized are more susceptible.

Huh?

[ILG]

Originally Posted by Timmy

Huh?

Yah, I didn't say that very clearly, did I??