|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|

10-27-2012, 06:45 PM
|
 |
Beautiful are the feet......
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
|
|
|
Iowa Newspaper Endorses Romney
The Desmoines Register, which hasn't endorsed a GOP candidate since 1972, has endorsed Romney! This could tip the balance in a battleground state.
http://www.desmoinesregister.com/front//
__________________
Words: For when an emoticon just isn't enough.
|

10-27-2012, 07:17 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,961
|
|
|
Re: Iowa Newspaper Endorses Romney
doesnt matter.
No Ohio or Pennsylvania (which wont happen) = no presidency. Those 6 electoral votes in Iowa wont get the job done
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillStanding
|
|

10-27-2012, 07:56 PM
|
 |
Beautiful are the feet......
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam
doesnt matter.
No Ohio or Pennsylvania (which wont happen) = no presidency. Those 6 electoral votes in Iowa wont get the job done
|
You're wrong. Romney can lose both Ohio and Pennsylvania and still win if he wins Iowa, Colorado and Wisconsin along with Florida. Romney is ahead in Colorado, ahead in Florida, even in Wisconsin and very close in Iowa. If Obama loses Ohio he's pretty much a gonner. Not so with Romney. The key state this election could be Wisconsin.
__________________
Words: For when an emoticon just isn't enough.
|

10-27-2012, 08:09 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,961
|
|
|
Re: Iowa Newspaper Endorses Romney
Romney is unfortunately not ahead in Wisconsin the current, today, spread is Obama +2.3 and today's investor spread is 70-30 for Obama.
I note that Co, NH, Fl, Va appear to be in the Romney column and as stated earlier it is not enough. Even including Iowa where the spread, today, is also +2.3 percentage points (investor spread is 60-40, Obama).
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillStanding
You're wrong. Romney can lose both Ohio and Pennsylvania and still win if he wins Iowa, Colorado and Wisconsin along with Florida. Romney is ahead in Colorado, ahead in Florida, even in Wisconsin and very close in Iowa. If Obama loses Ohio he's pretty much a gonner. Not so with Romney. The key state this election could be Wisconsin.
|
Last edited by Walks_in_islam; 10-27-2012 at 08:22 PM.
|

10-27-2012, 09:08 PM
|
 |
Beautiful are the feet......
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Right...behind...you!
Posts: 6,600
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam
Romney is unfortunately not ahead in Wisconsin the current, today, spread is Obama +2.3 and today's investor spread is 70-30 for Obama.
I note that Co, NH, Fl, Va appear to be in the Romney column and as stated earlier it is not enough. Even including Iowa where the spread, today, is also +2.3 percentage points (investor spread is 60-40, Obama).
|
Rasmussen's daily tracking poll has Wisconsin in a tie. This week's NBC/WSJ poll has Obama up by 6 points which is skewing the poll averages. If you take it out of the poll averages, Obama is leading by a razor thin margin of 1 point. I don't understand investor spread. Momentum seems to be in Romney's favor. Who really knows? The more Democratic leaning papers that endorse Romney, the more credibility that Romney gains with the undecideds.
Let's put it this way: It's anybody's ballgame! It's gonna be very close! I think Romney will win, but I could very well be wrong.
__________________
Words: For when an emoticon just isn't enough.
|

10-27-2012, 08:09 PM
|
 |
Holiness Is Still Right.
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Washington DC Area
Posts: 1,093
|
|
|
Re: Iowa Newspaper Endorses Romney
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillStanding
You're wrong. Romney can lose both Ohio and Pennsylvania and still win if he wins Iowa, Colorado and Wisconsin along with Florida. Romney is ahead in Colorado, ahead in Florida, even in Wisconsin and very close in Iowa. If Obama loses Ohio he's pretty much a gonner. Not so with Romney. The key state this election could be Wisconsin.
|
My gut feeling is that the election will once again come down to Florida or Ohio. Romney will get Iowa and Colorado and Obama will take Wisconsin.
|

10-27-2012, 08:22 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,961
|
|
|
Re: Iowa Newspaper Endorses Romney
Florida looks solid for Romney. Ohio is a must but stubbornly staying blue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by trialedbyfire
My gut feeling is that the election will once again come down to Florida or Ohio. Romney will get Iowa and Colorado and Obama will take Wisconsin.
|
|

10-27-2012, 09:04 PM
|
 |
Holiness Is Still Right.
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Washington DC Area
Posts: 1,093
|
|
|
Re: Iowa Newspaper Endorses Romney
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam
Florida looks solid for Romney. Ohio is a must but stubbornly staying blue.
|
Well I just checked by my own admission, the only way Romney can win without Ohio is if he gets Virginia, Wisconsin, and Florida. If Obama gets Wisconsin and Ohio and Romney gets Nevada, Florida, and Virginia it's be tied at 269 each the way I broke up the states. This is all also assuming Romney get's Colorado and Obama get's New Hampshire. Ohio is BIG. But so is Nevada and Wisconsin.
|

10-28-2012, 07:46 AM
|
 |
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 16,848
|
|
|
Re: Iowa Newspaper Endorses Romney
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walks_in_islam
Florida looks solid for Romney. Ohio is a must but stubbornly staying blue.
|
Gap may be closing. A poll released today showed both R and O tied at 49% in Ohio.
I am hoping that in the states where Obama is a point or two ahead in polling he will lose that due to the "enthusiasm gap" in regards to actual turnout to vote. It could be wishful thinking but I can hope!
__________________
"I think some people love spiritual bondage just the way some people love physical bondage. It makes them feel secure. In the end though it is not healthy for the one who is lost over it or the one who is lives under the oppression even if by their own choice"
Titus2woman on AFF
"We did not wear uniforms. The lady workers dressed in the current fashions of the day, ...silks...satins...jewels or whatever they happened to possess. They were very smartly turned out, so that they made an impressive appearance on the streets where a large part of our work was conducted in the early years.
"It was not until long after, when former Holiness preachers had become part of us, that strict plainness of dress began to be taught.
"Although Entire Sanctification was preached at the beginning of the Movement, it was from a Wesleyan viewpoint, and had in it very little of the later Holiness Movement characteristics. Nothing was ever said about apparel, for everyone was so taken up with the Lord that mode of dress seemingly never occurred to any of us."
Quote from Ethel Goss (widow of 1st UPC Gen Supt. Howard Goss) book "The Winds of God"
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:50 AM.
| |