Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron1710
Right. no qualifications as a historian at all.
Dr Thomas A Fudge undertook his research leading to a PhD in medieval history under the direction of R.W. (Bob) Scribner at Cambridge where he wrote on the subject “Myth, Heresy and Propaganda in the Radical Hussite Movement, 1409-1437”. He has worked in many monastic libraries, in archives in eastern and central Europe, and in some of the world’s great academic libraries such as the Bodley in Oxford, Harvard, and the Vatican. He is one of the founders of the biennial conference The Bohemian Reformation and Religious Practice which also publishes a journal by the same name. Volume 10 in that series is currently being edited. Prior to taking up his appointment at UNE, he taught at Warner Pacific College (Portland Oregon), Clark College (Vancouver), the University of Canterbury (Christchurch, New Zealand) and in the Texas prison system. Appointed to a university professorial chair in 2003, Dr. Fudge joined the UNE faculty in 2012.
|
"I could find little evidence that the preaching of the message and work of the cross figures centrally in a context dominated by water and Spirit."
The message of his death, burial and resurrection is the whole idea behind the New Birth. His death (
Cross) was necessary in order for the Resurrection to take place. The Resurrection was necessary in order for the Holy Ghost/the Comforter to come dwell in us.
That is the recurring theme (aside from also being buried with him in Baptism) and message I have been hearing for 28 years.
His "little evidence of the cross" is bogus.
He is just another man with a book.