The Real Evidence of Salvation

[Originalist]

Originally Posted by Esaias

And there's where the straw man gets built.



Peter declared the initial evidence doctrine when he said 'this is that'.

Could it not be argued that the "this is that" statement is referring to Joel's prophesy of Jehovah pouring out his Spirit?

[Esaias]

Originally Posted by Originalist

Could it not be argued that the "this is that" statement is referring to Joel's prophesy of Jehovah pouring out his Spirit?

Of course it does. And thus, 'initial evidence'.

Joel said when people receive the Spirit, they would 'prophesy' (speak by inspiration of the Spirit).

When Joel's words about the coming outpouring of the Spirit came to pass on that Pentecost day, those who received the Spirit 'spake with other tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance.' A crowd gathered and asked 'what's this all about?' and Peter says 'this is that'.

This - people speaking in other tongues.

That - Joel's prophecy of the outpouring of the Spirit 'and they shall prophesy'.

Joel's prophecy was that all God's covenanted people would receive the spirit 'and prophesy'. Prophesying was the one sign Joel mentioned that would be universal. The servants (males) and handmaidens (females), the sons (males) and daughters (females) would prophesy.

When this prophecy came to pass and was fulfilled, it was fulfilled by the disciples of Jesus receiving the Spirit and 'speaking with other tongues'.

Therefore, the apostolic interpretation of 'they shall prophesy' is found in the disciples' speaking with tongues. Not my interpretation, but the apostle Peter's interpretation. And not really his 'interpretation', but rather his declaration under the anointing of the Holy Ghost that THIS IS THAT WHICH WAS SPOKEN OF BY THE PROPHET JOEL.

So yes, 'initial evidence doctrine' is clearly, unambiguously, and unequivocally declared point blank in the New Testament, in a didactic portion of Scripture (Peter's sermon on Pentecost), specifically designed for evangelistic purposes.

[Michael The Disciple]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Of course it does. And thus, 'initial evidence'.

Joel said when people receive the Spirit, they would 'prophesy' (speak by inspiration of the Spirit).

When Joel's words about the coming outpouring of the Spirit came to pass on that Pentecost day, those who received the Spirit 'spake with other tongues as the Spirit gave them utterance.' A crowd gathered and asked 'what's this all about?' and Peter says 'this is that'.

This - people speaking in other tongues.

That - Joel's prophecy of the outpouring of the Spirit 'and they shall prophesy'.

Joel's prophecy was that all God's covenanted people would receive the spirit 'and prophesy'. Prophesying was the one sign Joel mentioned that would be universal. The servants (males) and handmaidens (females), the sons (males) and daughters (females) would prophesy.

When this prophecy came to pass and was fulfilled, it was fulfilled by the disciples of Jesus receiving the Spirit and 'speaking with other tongues'.

Therefore, the apostolic interpretation of 'they shall prophesy' is found in the disciples' speaking with tongues. Not my interpretation, but the apostle Peter's interpretation. And not really his 'interpretation', but rather his declaration under the anointing of the Holy Ghost that THIS IS THAT WHICH WAS SPOKEN OF BY THE PROPHET JOEL.

So yes, 'initial evidence doctrine' is clearly, unambiguously, and unequivocally declared point blank in the New Testament, in a didactic portion of Scripture (Peter's sermon on Pentecost), specifically designed for evangelistic purposes.

Very good. And even if we look at it as prophecy as distinct from tongues Evangelicals would certainly not touch such a teaching with a ten foot pole.

Their job is to discredit any REAL experience in the salvation/new birth teaching.