Are All the Apostolics Gone from AFF?

[Godzchild]

Originally Posted by MarcBee

Interesting. Please allow me to explore your line of reasoning. If, suppose, your husband one night wanted you to go out with him, and also asked that you dress in a really slutty way (no, he didn't use the word, but it still ended up being something you personally regarded as "slutty") would you do it because what really counts is "<<the opinion of my husband>>" ?

Would your other comment also apply in such a case, that
"<<the rest of the world can just Take It To Jesus.>>" ?

(PS, this is only a "what if" question, as I realize your own husband would not ask you to do that.)

omg.....really...??? please allow me to answer this asinine question....(without getting myself banned) THERE IS NO *what if* !!!! NO.....I would not dress *slutty* never have !!! My husband is a real man....NOT a freak or a perv who wants his wife *eyed* !! >:-( My style of dress is never out of line or even close to be *revealing* or as you say ... slutty. And I will still stand by what I said....my husband is the only one I care about who thinks what! If he has ever seen something out of line of what he thinks is NOT descent....he will let me know and no more is said about it! As for the latter.....heck yes it would still stand....*take it to Jesus* I am so sick of people who pass judgment on others who dress *out of their own close minded way of thinking* and so therefore, that makes another look like a sinner, slut or dressing immodest! ! seriously......
I do not think it is descent for a woman to show ones mid section (ie...belly) or wear low riders, low cut tops or even shorts. In which I do not wear any of the above. My jeans are modest, not *cutting* and not indecent!

[MarcBee]

Originally Posted by Godzchild

omg.....really...??? ...
I do not think it is descent for a woman to show ones mid section (ie...belly) or wear low riders, low cut tops or even shorts. In which I do not wear any of the above. My jeans are modest, not *cutting* and not indecent!

That's fine, I accept your rebuke, but my implied point is merely to teach that one person's (or even a given religious population's) opinion concerning "indecency" is merely another person's (or another population's) "freedom of dress." So, the thought experiment I hoped you would engage with obviously did not work for you. I was trying to help you consider the line of thought that others think is equally true, with equal opinionated claims. See, to YOU, apparently, to show one's mid section or belly is indeed "INDECENT." To others, the line falls elsewhere.

Fine. But why, apart from your opinion (so far not any better than anyone else's opinion) can you substantiate that claim?

Your reasoning, so far, comes down to opinion, such as <<I do not think it it descent (sic) for a woman to show one's mid section>>

Ok. Again, why?