|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |

12-16-2013, 09:38 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: 150 miles north of the Mississiippi coast
Posts: 495
|
|
|
Re: Is There A Difference In?
Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
Yes, there's a difference; but also we should stop equating holiness with dress standards. It's a disservice to the subject of Holiness to simply make it about dress standards.
Mention "Holiness standards" in the average UPC church and the overwhelming majority of people will think "dress standards." It's so much more than personal opinion and gripes about what people wear.
|
Yes it is n david, but it is offensive when people who do these things, and look so nice, are subjected to rude comments. For example, if someone wants to dress in Modest attire, why should that offend anyone, and give them cause to make ugly remarks?
|

12-16-2013, 09:41 AM
|
 |
On the road less traveled
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: On a mountain... somewhere
Posts: 8,369
|
|
|
Re: Is There A Difference In?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Scarlett
Yes it is n david, but it is offensive when people who do these things, and look so nice, are subjected to rude comments. For example, if someone wants to dress in Modest attire, why should that offend anyone, and give them cause to make ugly remarks?
|
That goes both ways. Have you ever made ugly remarks about a woman in slacks?
|

12-16-2013, 09:53 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 17,807
|
|
|
Re: Is There A Difference In?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Scarlett
Yes it is n david, but it is offensive when people who do these things, and look so nice, are subjected to rude comments. For example, if someone wants to dress in Modest attire, why should that offend anyone, and give them cause to make ugly remarks?
|
It shouldn't offend. I've heard and read remarks like this before:
Quote:
Originally Posted by obriencp
Yes we are to be separate and holy, but to say we should stand out solely based on our out-dated attire can be a slippery slope of ignoring the inner man while adorning the outward. You can dress modestly without looking like you stepped out of a time machine.
|
It's unfair to paint with a broad brush. I have seen very, very few UPC women wearing out-dated attire or look like they've stepped out of a time machine. It's not to say I haven't seen them, but it's very rare. So suggesting that because someone believes in dress standards is out of date or unfashionable is not entirely accurate.
|

12-16-2013, 10:13 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 441
|
|
|
Re: Is There A Difference In?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miss Scarlett
Is that how you feel about our Ladies, that they go around in OUT-Dated Attire? Our ladies look very nice and up to date. We may be from the south, but we do not look like Old Time washer women, and this post is very offensive to those of us who still choose to wear skirts.
Do these people look as if they are dressing in Out Dated Attire, or do they look like happy Christians, who joy in serving God?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by n david
It shouldn't offend. I've heard and read remarks like this before:
It's unfair to paint with a broad brush. I have seen very, very few UPC women wearing out-dated attire or look like they've stepped out of a time machine. It's not to say I haven't seen them, but it's very rare. So suggesting that because someone believes in dress standards is out of date or unfashionable is not entirely accurate.
|
I apologize for making a broad statement that has offended. Honestly, I did not mean to offend and the pics that Miss Scarlett posted show beautiful people that are dressed modestly and in current trends. Please accept my apologies.
The point I was trying to make is that some are too concerned with how to appear different from the world. If we want to stand out that kind of goes against modesty in that it is immodest if we stand out too much. The skirt wearing women of the 1950's didn't stand out in an obvious manner whereas sometimes they do now.
I agree that we shouldn't tie certain 'holiness' standards to salvation and judge solely on hair/skirt length, make-up, jewelry, etc.
Again, I apologize for my insensitive comments.
Last edited by obriencp; 12-16-2013 at 10:14 AM.
Reason: typo
|

12-16-2013, 10:58 AM
|
|
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: 150 miles north of the Mississiippi coast
Posts: 495
|
|
|
Re: Is There A Difference In?
Quote:
Originally Posted by obriencp
I apologize for making a broad statement that has offended. Honestly, I did not mean to offend and the pics that Miss Scarlett posted show beautiful people that are dressed modestly and in current trends. Please accept my apologies.
The point I was trying to make is that some are too concerned with how to appear different from the world. If we want to stand out that kind of goes against modesty in that it is immodest if we stand out too much. The skirt wearing women of the 1950's didn't stand out in an obvious manner whereas sometimes they do now.
I agree that we shouldn't tie certain 'holiness' standards to salvation and judge solely on hair/skirt length, make-up, jewelry, etc.
Again, I apologize for my insensitive comments.
|
Thank you very much, your apology is accepted and very much appreciated. I did not start this thread to start any type rudeness or name calling. I never mentioned that our dress was a heaven or hell issue, I guess it was just assumed. Enough said on this post.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:09 PM.
| |