Question?

[ILG]

Originally Posted by LadyRev

If the "technicalities" of baptism aren't important, then why did the disciples that were baptized unto John's baptism in Acts 19 have to be rebaptized?

1And it came to pass, that, while Apollos was at Corinth, Paul having passed through the upper coasts came to Ephesus: and finding certain disciples, 2He said unto them, Have ye received the Holy Ghost since ye believed? And they said unto him, We have not so much as heard whether there be any Holy Ghost. 3And he said unto them, Unto what then were ye baptized? And they said, Unto John's baptism. 4Then said Paul, John verily baptized with the baptism of repentance, saying unto the people, that they should believe on him which should come after him, that is, on Christ Jesus. 5When they heard this, they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus. 6And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied.

Apparently because they weren't followers of Jesus before then. But the Jesus name baptism promoters, meaning those who demand a 3rd party pronounces the name of Jesus over a candidate, demand rebaptism of those who are already Jesus followers.