Quote:
Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa
|
For every study against wheat, there is one FOR it!
https://www.organicfacts.net/health-...eal/wheat.html
So... who to believe? The same goes for just about anything that involves a scientific study. How do you really know if the scientists haven't skewed the facts to make their study prove a theory they had before beginning the study? How many people were involved in the study? 2, 10 or 100,000? Most studies usually only use a few people, and they use those results to come to a conclusion, which is risky, in my opinion.
We have seen way too many "facts" that science has presented, to later become "fiction" as more science and evidence emerges.
I say we need to pay attention to our body. Try going off wheat. If it makes you feel better, then great, you probably need to stay away from it. If there is no change or difference by going off of it, then your body may not be affected by it.
I do not believe every single person reacts exactly the same way to the same things. Our blood types are different, the way our bodies metabolize fats and proteins can be different, and so... it has become my philosophy that instead of believing every single piece of literature that comes out for or against something... I listen to my body, and if trying something seems to make me feel better - great. I don't then go shoving that down everyone else's throat, making them do what I've done, because my body may work differently than theirs.
Instead... each one of us needs to pay attention to what makes us feel better, and what doesn't. This is my humble opinion.
Hybrid Mode
