Did Jesus Wear Pants?

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

Hey, Skippy, I am not arguing with you about pants or dresses. They have already been universally designated for men or women, respectively.

I am saying that it doesn’t matter who decided to call “breeches” capris or knee shorts. The Bible tells me the length was specific- covering the loins and reaching to the thigh. You can stretch them as long as you want and call them breeches all day long. However, the Bible, not an Enclyclopedia determined the length. If we would stick with this truth, we wouldn’t get confused and have so many silly posts that answer nada.

Ok length or not, any garment made like that is for a man. I don't care who designated it. We don't have to worry about what does pertain unto a man or a woman. He has not left us without a idea.

Theres no further answer to find, if you want me to be honest I believe this is talking about dress as well as a woman trying to usurp and rule over a man. Or a man trying to dress or act and be led by a woman. I think they are all an abomination unto the Lord thy God.

So while pants matter they truthfully are the least of the matter. So a woman pastor, or president we don't have to wonder how God feels about that. A woman that tries to lead her husband also, the same way. And is exactly why the old adage says "we know who wears the pants in that relationship." Where do you think all these things come from, as if its such a mystery about gender distinctions in dress? As we see they are as old as Moses. But we get to some place in time and think they we need to reinvent the wheel. Even though this is normal in our society, it's not normal for any society before us. Oh I take that back, besides pagan societies, entrenched in idol worship. It's not hard to figure out which ones correct. Or shouldn't be. They done got so bad in our society people don't even know what bathroom to use... It all speaks for itself.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by Pressing-On

I am not arguing with you about pants or dresses. They have already been universally designated for men or women, respectively.

Look they can be a dress designed for a man but guess what its still against Deuteronomy 22:5. There can be pants designed for women but guess what they are still against Deuteronomy 22:5. Period.

Regardless of what a Godless culture does, we shouldn't judge anything by the worlds standards.

[houston]

I really don’t want to know this... do you men wear underwear that reach your thighs?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by houston

I really don’t want to know this... do you men wear underwear that reach your thighs?

What did I miss?

[jediwill83]

What I wanna know is would Jesus wear a Rolex on His television show.

[Tithesmeister]

Originally Posted by houston

I really don’t want to know this... do you men wear underwear that reach your thighs?

Of course. It’s in the Bible.

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Jesus wore pants.

Mary wore a dress.

Rachel Rose wore both.

Church people seem confuse.

This generation now wants to be gender neutral.

Good grief

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by jediwill83

What I wanna know is would Jesus wear a Rolex on His television show.

Absolutely not, and He wouldn't have a TV Show for that matter.

[1ofthechosen]

Originally Posted by houston

I really don’t want to know this... do you men wear underwear that reach your thighs?

Yes

[houston]

Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen

Absolutely not, and He wouldn't have a TV Show for that matter.

You don’t know that.