Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ofthechosen
I was clear it was anything in the design. We have scripture of God initiating the making of them. And then cultures through histories, even keeping the same name for them. So we don't have to worry about where the design came from God , and we see through history they were always intended for men. So they weren't just undergarments.
Y'all can deny hard evidence all you want, but should I follow your opinion or what is clearly seen from scripture and history?
Hey maybe I should share with you this ground breaking piece of evidence. Any 5 year old can read it. This is the universal sign for bathroom.. Hey and it even says Feman for female, but she still put a dress on. Good for her!  |
Hey, Skippy, I am not arguing with you about pants or dresses. They have already been universally designated for men or women, respectively.
I am saying that it doesn’t matter who decided to call “breeches” capris or knee shorts. The Bible tells me the length was specific- covering the loins and reaching to the thigh. You can stretch them as long as you want and call them breeches all day long. However, the Bible, not an Enclyclopedia determined the length. If we would stick with this truth, we wouldn’t get confused and have so many silly posts that answer nada.
Threaded Mode
