The Reason Some Apostolics Are Concerned: The Results of Erased Lines - Page 24

Steve Epley · #**231** 10-31-2007, 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea

His conversion was fairly early during the New Issue

As late as the 1920's he was fellowshipping w/ the PAOC ... a hybrid org.

But thank you for the h.w. assignment .... I will provide you w/ more data.

Furthermore, he, unlike you .... believed they were saved ... was he an apostate?

Bishop Haywood believed in the 'light doctrine' I do not! However he did teach no was born again without water & Spirit. He taught the new birth. I do not agree with the accomodation he made about those who did not believe the message. NO he was NOT an apostate however he was wrong.

#**232** 10-31-2007, 05:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Bishop Haywood believed in the 'light doctrine' I do not! However he did teach no was born again without water & Spirit. He taught the new birth. I do not agree with the accomodation he made about those who did not believe the message. NO he was NOT an apostate however he was wrong.

Elder... go on and explain the difference between just being 'wrong' and being 'apostate'. Take your liberty!

Steve Epley · #**233** 10-31-2007, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steadfast

Elder... go on and explain the difference between just being 'wrong' and being 'apostate'. Take your liberty!

Elder Haywood was searching and discovering truth...line upon line....this bunch is deserting truth. The direction is different.

#**234** 10-31-2007, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Elder Haywood was searching and discovering truth...line upon line....this buch is deserting truth.

HeavenlyOne · #**235** 10-31-2007, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RevDWW

What? No amens?

I didn't see that post but I certainly AMEN it.

ILG · #**236** 10-31-2007, 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ferd

i dont know where you got standards from what I posted. Doctrine is the deal for me.

I'm talking about the general jist of this thread.

Steve Epley · #**237** 10-31-2007, 05:21 PM

Anyone know the difference between climbing and sliding??? Going up or coming down????
In the early 1900's men were searching for truths and deeper experiences in God. Now men are searching for recognition and popularity($$$$$$$$$$$$$$)

>

ILG · #**238** 10-31-2007, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Anyone know the difference between climbing and sliding??? Going up or coming down????
In the early 1900's men were searching for truths and deeper experiences in God. Now men are searching for recognition and popularity($$$$$$$$$$$$$$)

>

That's what my husband and I were searching for...yeeeessssiirrrr!! That's why we resigned and became nobodies, preaching no where, belonging nowhere because we wanted RECOGNITION, POPULARITY AND DOLLARS!!!

#**239** 10-31-2007, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Anyone know the difference between climbing and sliding??? Going up or coming down????
In the early 1900's men were searching for truths and deeper experiences in God. Now men are searching for recognition and popularity($$$$$$$$$$$$$$)

>

(Watch out, folks! Epley is just two tingles from anointing right now!)

Go on, Elder, tell us how you really feel!

Steve Epley · #**240** 10-31-2007, 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILG

That's what my husband and I were searching for...yeeeessssiirrrr!! That's why we resigned and became nobodies, preaching no where, belonging nowhere because we wanted RECOGNITION, POPULARITY AND DOLLARS!!!

You were Bishops in the PAW???????????????????????????