Quote:
Originally Posted by tstew
Crakjak, I understand that. I have been hearing that my entire life. I'm just asking what that means and what specifically the pro-life candidates are promising to do about abortion and what specifically we should expect to have happen so that this is not just a perpetual vote-getter and rhetoric.
Noone is answering that specific question.
|
I don't know that there will be an answer to this question. Sometimes it sure seems like Republicans use the big A as a bait-and-switch issue. They talk tough (or inspirational, to be accurate) about the sanctity of life, but not much progress is made.
However, more progress has been made under Bush than any other president.
To a large degree, progress is awaiting a grass-roots re-awakening. The radical feminists are more vocal, more pushy, more energized, and more active than the pro-lifers. And not necessarily because more pro-lifers are gainfully employed.
I think we make a mistake if all we ever do is pine away for the big prize: the overturning of
Roe. There are tactics, strategy, steps, and a lot of winning peoples' hearts that need to happen first.
Even if
Roe is overturned, many abortions will still occur, because it will revert to the rights of the individual states to decide. Unless there is a constitutional amendment. While I am all for states' rights, nothing short of a miracle is going to stop the increasing centralization of control. What a pity we are so incapable of learning and applying the lessons of the USSR appropriately.
I feel like some Republican politicians treat me, a pro-lifer, like some Democrat politicians treat Blacks: A token speech is made, party loyalty is taken for granted, and virtually nothing is done on behalf of the constituency's interests. The militant homosexuals are getting more results than Blacks or pro-lifers.