Covering:Veil or Hair: Part II? Answers Inside

[Aquila]

Originally Posted by LUKE2447

I find it sad you don't understand the clear teaching WHY she is to wear a covering. You basically make the covering nothing because other areas show submission and modesty as well. Nice logic! Paul clearly goes into depth on why women should wear them. hmmm God wants order, the devil doesn't. You negate that order and I support it. I like my side!

So if my wife wears a rag on her head it proves she’s submitted to me? LOL

The order God wants is a submitted wife who is modest in all things be they head coverings, dresses, shoes, blouses, or even attitude. God isn’t banking entirely upon a rag on her head. That’s silly. God’s order isn’t focused on a rag on some woman’s head. It’s modesty and submission in general.

Yeah, I'll take panty hose and other things as symbols of submission "FOR THE HEAD"
I agree modesty and propriety is not just about the veil. Just because modesty is not all summed up in a veil does not negate the veil as you are so proud of.

Bro… the issue was modesty and submission. If Paul would have been preaching in the 1960’s the question would be women burning their bras and not wearing them even when attending church. It’s so much bigger than a magic rag on a woman’s head.

I love how you just negate truth because of culture today. Way to accept a lie because somehow today's worldy culture determines the culture of the church and truth!

Bro… I’m saying it’s far more expansive. You’re saying all that matters is a rag on a woman’s head. I’m saying that the veil was only the immediate catalyst for Paul’s instructions. Paul’s instructions apply to all a woman wears, does, and even the attitude that she holds. It’s bigger than a magic rag on the head. lol

I'll base my views on divine order and creation as the reason for a covering when approaching God and you can stick with today's culture as the reason for women and men to and not to wear a covering.

Again, if a wife wears a rag on her head it PROVES she’s submitted? Not hardly.

[LUKE2447]

Originally Posted by Aquila

So if my wife wears a rag on her head it proves she’s submitted to me? LOL

No, but it is something that she should do as part of here submission and sign of authority before the angels and God.

The order God wants is a submitted wife who is modest in all things be they head coverings, dresses, shoes, blouses, or even attitude. God isn’t banking entirely upon a rag on her head. That’s silly. God’s order isn’t focused on a rag on some woman’s head. It’s modesty and submission in general.

Again you are making argument out of nothing as nobody said modesty is not about alot of things. we are dealingSTICTLY WITH A COVERING and you should stick to the text instead of bringing otehr things in that PAUL DOES NOT MENTION to thwart what Paul clearly says and you throw off like yesterday's garbage.

I find it funny you use God isn't banking "entirely" upon a rag upon her head. Yet Paul gives reason and you can sit back a make all the "current" culture arguments you want but it doesn't negate creation.

Bro… the issue was modesty and submission. If Paul would have been preaching in the 1960’s the question would be women burning their bras and not wearing them even when attending church. It’s so much bigger than a magic rag on a woman’s head.

Yes, it is bigger but it doesn't negate clear teaching of which you give more authority to today's culture than the Word of God and the order of creation.

Bro… I’m saying it’s far more expansive. You’re saying all that matters is a rag on a woman’s head. I’m saying that the veil was only the immediate catalyst for Paul’s instructions. Paul’s instructions apply to all a woman wears, does, and even the attitude that she holds. It’s bigger than a magic rag on the head. lol

You have not read what I have said or you are lying!

Again, if a wife wears a rag on her head it PROVES she’s submitted? Not hardly.

No, but it is something the angels look for and Paul teaches is a parallel of spiritual authority.