Quote:
Originally Posted by LUKE2447
I find it sad you don't understand the clear teaching WHY she is to wear a covering. You basically make the covering nothing because other areas show submission and modesty as well. Nice logic! Paul clearly goes into depth on why women should wear them. hmmm God wants order, the devil doesn't. You negate that order and I support it. I like my side!
|
So if my wife wears a rag on her head it
proves she’s submitted to me? LOL
The order God wants is a submitted wife who is modest in all things be they head coverings, dresses, shoes, blouses, or even attitude. God isn’t banking entirely upon a rag on her head. That’s silly. God’s order isn’t focused on a rag on some woman’s head. It’s modesty and submission in general.
Quote:
Yeah, I'll take panty hose and other things as symbols of submission "FOR THE HEAD"
I agree modesty and propriety is not just about the veil. Just because modesty is not all summed up in a veil does not negate the veil as you are so proud of.
|
Bro… the issue was modesty and submission. If Paul would have been preaching in the 1960’s the question would be women burning their bras and not wearing them even when attending church. It’s so much bigger than a magic rag on a woman’s head.
Quote:
|
I love how you just negate truth because of culture today. Way to accept a lie because somehow today's worldy culture determines the culture of the church and truth!
|
Bro… I’m saying it’s far more expansive. You’re saying all that matters is a rag on a woman’s head. I’m saying that the veil was only the immediate catalyst for Paul’s instructions. Paul’s instructions apply to all a woman wears, does, and even the attitude that she holds. It’s bigger than a magic rag on the head. lol
Quote:
|
I'll base my views on divine order and creation as the reason for a covering when approaching God and you can stick with today's culture as the reason for women and men to and not to wear a covering.
|
Again, if a wife wears a rag on her head it PROVES she’s submitted? Not hardly.