Re: Monopoly on Apostolic Identity is no more ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by deltaguitar
Yep. Next thing you know you won't be any different than the baptist. I still can't understand why people have so many problems with the Baptist folks.
I heard a lifelong pentecostal testify in our church that he grew up in Pentecost but didn't get "saved" until he went to the Baptist church. He now goes to a Pentecostal church but struggles with the doctrinal inconsistencies.
Not the point... but true enough that considering the outward appearance there will be no separation between that of the church and the world...
but of course that is being "relevant" to reach those that are lost... silly me I forgot...
Re: Monopoly on Apostolic Identity is no more ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by revrandy
Not the point... but true enough that considering the outward appearance there will be no separation between that of the church and the world...
but of course that is being "relevant" to reach those that are lost... silly me I forgot...
Modesty of appearance can be exhibited without looking like a woman comes out of a 1950 magazine.
__________________
His banner over me is LOVE.... My soul followeth hard after thee....Love one another with a pure heart fervently. Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?
To be a servant of God, it will cost us our total commitment to God, and God alone. His burden must be our burden... Sis Alvear
Re: Monopoly on Apostolic Identity is no more ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizpeh
Modesty of appearance can be exhibited without looking like a woman comes out of a 1950 magazine.
come on most women in the UPCI don't look like the 50's. Also most pants "IMO" are not modest nor respectful in love to the men around them and most are manish. Also to me they do not present the honor and grace of the woman but excercise the woman as a item to be grasped. That is not love! Again my opinion!
Re: Monopoly on Apostolic Identity is no more ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUKE2447
come on most women in the UPCI don't look like the 50's. Also most pants "IMO" are not modest nor respectful in love to the men around them and most are manish. Also to me they do not present the honor and grace of the woman but excercise it as a item to be grasped. Again my opinion!
great googly moogly!
what a hair brained opinion that is! LOL! That is just wierd. Its like I have walked into an "Idea Walmart".
You see the oddest people in walmart.
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
Re: Monopoly on Apostolic Identity is no more ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by LUKE2447
come on most women in the UPCI don't look like the 50's. Also most pants "IMO" are not modest nor respectful in love to the men around them and most are manish. Also to me they do not present the honor and grace of the woman but excercise the woman as a item to be grasped. That is not love! Again my opinion!
Alright, the hairstyles look like the 1890's and the clothing is an updated version of 1950 styles.
If pants are not modest on women, then they are not modest on men either.
__________________
His banner over me is LOVE.... My soul followeth hard after thee....Love one another with a pure heart fervently. Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?
To be a servant of God, it will cost us our total commitment to God, and God alone. His burden must be our burden... Sis Alvear
Re: Monopoly on Apostolic Identity is no more ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by mizpeh
Alright, the hairstyles look like the 1890's and the clothing is an updated version of 1950 styles.
If pants are not modest on women, then they are not modest on men either.
I'm not understanding how men can justify going from a dress-like garment to wearing pants, but balk about a woman doing the same and considering her to be immodest. History tells us that when men started wearing pants, they were not only considered to be immodest, but unmanly as well!! Isn't it great that we lost that way of thinking a while back? Or did we??
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
Re: Monopoly on Apostolic Identity is no more ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
Personally, I think the distinction of dress scripture is targetting cross dressing. lol
I agree.
__________________
His banner over me is LOVE.... My soul followeth hard after thee....Love one another with a pure heart fervently. Jesus saith unto her, Said I not unto thee, that, if thou wouldest believe, thou shouldest see the glory of God?
To be a servant of God, it will cost us our total commitment to God, and God alone. His burden must be our burden... Sis Alvear
Re: Monopoly on Apostolic Identity is no more ....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquila
Personally, I think the distinction of dress scripture is targetting cross dressing. lol
hmmm well let's see. Go to the mall and see how much the line are blurred now than years past. hmmm why? Femimism? Yes! The change in culture was not one of Christian perspective but of liberalism etc... Christianity was slow to react. Thus why I still won't go with the feminists as to go with them you basically agree with the whole movement. Since then look at society and how man and women are looked at. Instead of man doing his job it takes women and men to take care of the home. Why? The market place had to make a correction for added labor. Instead of one doing the bread winning you have two now to do the job of one. Thus now we have a breakdown at homewith the kids.... Everything happens for a reason and the gender blurring happened in all areas not just clothing.