Cosmetics???

[Timmy]

Originally Posted by pelathais

Well, I for one will not use eye shadow. hmmm... unless that camo stuff used for hunting counts.

But I agree with Sister A - get rid of the ties. What's with those things any way? And every sort of do-bob and bo-dangle. T-Shirts and Blues jeans are the most appropriate "uniform" for the Apostolic gentleman.

Well, OK, but the jeans can't have any decorative stitching on the pockets. And the T-shirts: nothing printed on them, but that goes without saying.

[Sister Alvear]

Originally Posted by Timmy

Well, OK, but the jeans can't have any decorative stitching on the pockets. And the T-shirts: nothing printed on them, but that goes without saying.

Now. Tim you know those T-shirts are underclothes...

[Timmy]

Originally Posted by Sister Alvear

Now. Tim you know those T-shirts are underclothes...

Oh my. Hadn't thought of that! Pel, bad boy!

[tbpew]

"Truthstirrer" writes: [correction assumed and inserted by tbpew]

let's [not] fight over standards thread, I just want others input on the subject.

Based on the first set of replies, has your starter post resulted in what you had hoped for?

Can you amplify what kind of direct and specific input you would expect that is not packaged as a debate relating to outward standards?

I feel its important and timely to wait for MOW to post on this thread.

[Truthseeker]

Originally Posted by tbpew

"Truthstirrer" writes: [correction assumed and inserted by tbpew]


Based on the first set of replies, has your starter post resulted in what you had hoped for?

Can you amplify what kind of direct and specific input you would expect that is not packaged as a debate relating to outward standards?

I feel its important and timely to wait for MOW to post on this thread.

I meant not fight over it, my questions are a honest inquiry on what the word says on the subject. I mostly trying to show my intent was not to just argue another standard, but seek out the turth on the subject.