Jason DEBATE MATTHEW 24 Luke21 Mark 13

[TJJJ]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Elder respectfully there have been debates already done where futurist debated Preterists on the above. All issues on eschatology are broad, which ones are not?

This is what I have been asking this Brother to confirm.

http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...ad.php?t=23087

With much respect

In Jesus name

Brother Benincasa

www.OnTimeJournal.com

I think what Epley is trying to say, (forgive me if I am wrong) is that if you have too broad of a topic then the debate quickly gets off track and tends to wander. He is right on the fact of having specific points to talk about. That is how it is done. If you want to have multiple points then you have multiple debates. Narrow down the points, articulate them, challenge your opposer, and DEBATE!

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TJJJ

I think what Epley is trying to say, (forgive me if I am wrong) is that if you have too broad of a topic then the debate quickly gets off track and tends to wander. He is right on the fact of having specific points to talk about. That is how it is done. If you want to have multiple points then you have multiple debates. Narrow down the points, articulate them, challenge your opposer, and DEBATE!

Thank you.

When there is no proposition or it is too broad then the discussions wanders so far any subject becomes game.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Thank you.

When there is no proposition or it is too broad then the discussions wanders so far any subject becomes game.

And you accuse me of not answering Bro. Anderson’s Q&A session properly?? Well, so much for judging without preference.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

And you accuse me of not answering Bro. Anderson’s Q&A session properly?? Well, so much for judging without preference.

Splain.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Splain.

Just reread your own posts....

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

And you accuse me of not answering Bro. Anderson’s Q&A session properly?? Well, so much for judging without preference.

Did I say I had NO preference??????????????????

Anyone who has followed any of these forums knows that I am NOT a preterist. Partial or Full.

I was discussing the format NOT the subject.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Did I say I had NO preference??????????????????

Anyone who has followed any of these forums knows that I am NOT a preterist. Partial or Full.

I was discussing the format NOT the subject.

Then discuss how Bro. Anderson never did show what the apostles taught. THAT was the problem from the beginning. But, see, this is where the judging without preference comes in; since he is YOUR man, you have to protect him and attack me. It is plain that he did NOT prove what the apostles taught. All you have to do is read his words to see that. I am not the only one who has said this. I asked him to PLEASE get on the agreed subject in my responses. I said my usage of Daniel 9:24 was in effort to accomplish that. So, please, quit trying to find a reason why I made him quit. He did that all by himself.

[TJJJ]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Then discuss how Bro. Anderson never did show what the apostles taught. THAT was the problem from the beginning. But, see, this is where the judging without preference comes in; since he is YOUR man, you have to protect him and attack me. It is plain that he did NOT prove what the apostles taught. All you have to do is read his words to see that. I am not the only one who has said this. I asked him to PLEASE get on the agreed subject in my responses. I said my usage of Daniel 9:24 was in effort to accomplish that. So, please, quit trying to find a reason why I made him quit. He did that all by himself.

Forgive me for asking, I am not real familiar with the landscape here. I am just wanting to read a real debate. What do you mean with the statement that Anderson is Epley's man? Did he come out of that church or what?

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TJJJ

Forgive me for asking, I am not real familiar with the landscape here. I am just wanting to read a real debate. What do you mean with the statement that Anderson is Epley's man? Did he come out of that church or what?

I am a futurist and Elder Andersen is a futurist I have no idea what he teaches concerning the endtime with the except he does believe Jesus is coming again. Another strawman by Elder Burk the leader.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by TJJJ

Forgive me for asking, I am not real familiar with the landscape here. I am just wanting to read a real debate. What do you mean with the statement that Anderson is Epley's man? Did he come out of that church or what?

Bro. Epley has a habit of agreeing with pretty much anyone who disagrees with AFP. I meant in lighthearted to him.

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

I am a futurist and Elder Andersen is a futurist I have no idea what he teaches concerning the endtime with the except he does believe Jesus is coming again. Another strawman by Elder Burk the leader.

See what I mean?