Jason DEBATE MATTHEW 24 Luke21 Mark 13

[Evang.Benincasa]

Jason you will PROVE Matthew 24 Luke 21 Mark 13 to be future events. This is what I have been challenging you on.

Now it is put up, or move on.


Signed

Evangelist Dominic Benincasa

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Jason you will PROVE Matthew 24 Luke 21 Mark 13 to be future events. This is what I have been challenging you on.

Now it is put up, or move on.


Signed

Evangelist Dominic Benincasa

Friend NO one in their right mind would affirm this because some of this was fulfilled in 70AD AND it is too broad.
Narrow it down:
Be it resolved the scriptures teach a FUTURE LITERAL return of Christ to catch his church away, resurrect the dead, and judge the wicked.

[TJJJ]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Jason you will PROVE Matthew 24 Luke 21 Mark 13 to be future events. This is what I have been challenging you on.

Now it is put up, or move on.


Signed

Evangelist Dominic Benincasa

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Friend NO one in their right mind would affirm this because some of this was fulfilled in 70AD AND it is too broad.
Narrow it down:
Be it resolved the scriptures teach a FUTURE LITERAL return of Christ to catch his church away, resurrect the dead, and judge the wicked.

Elder respectfully there have been debates already done where futurist debated Preterists on the above. All issues on eschatology are broad, which ones are not?

This is what I have been asking this Brother to confirm.

http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...ad.php?t=23087

With much respect

In Jesus name

Brother Benincasa

www.OnTimeJournal.com

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Elder respectfully there have been debates already done where futurist debated Preterists on the above. All issues on eschatology are broad, which ones are not?

This is what I have been asking this Brother to confirm.

http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...ad.php?t=23087

With much respect

In Jesus name

Brother Benincasa

www.OnTimeJournal.com

My friend I do NOT know ONE Futurist that would debate ALL of the passages are FUTURE and NONE of them were fulfilled in 70 AD. Would you cite someone who does not believe the destruction of the temple was not included in those chapters?

[TJJJ]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Elder respectfully there have been debates already done where futurist debated Preterists on the above. All issues on eschatology are broad, which ones are not?

This is what I have been asking this Brother to confirm.

http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com...ad.php?t=23087

With much respect

In Jesus name

Brother Benincasa

www.OnTimeJournal.com

I think what Epley is trying to say, (forgive me if I am wrong) is that if you have too broad of a topic then the debate quickly gets off track and tends to wander. He is right on the fact of having specific points to talk about. That is how it is done. If you want to have multiple points then you have multiple debates. Narrow down the points, articulate them, challenge your opposer, and DEBATE!

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TJJJ

I think what Epley is trying to say, (forgive me if I am wrong) is that if you have too broad of a topic then the debate quickly gets off track and tends to wander. He is right on the fact of having specific points to talk about. That is how it is done. If you want to have multiple points then you have multiple debates. Narrow down the points, articulate them, challenge your opposer, and DEBATE!

Thank you.

When there is no proposition or it is too broad then the discussions wanders so far any subject becomes game.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Thank you.

When there is no proposition or it is too broad then the discussions wanders so far any subject becomes game.

And you accuse me of not answering Bro. Anderson’s Q&A session properly?? Well, so much for judging without preference.

[Steve Epley]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

And you accuse me of not answering Bro. Anderson’s Q&A session properly?? Well, so much for judging without preference.

Splain.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Steve Epley

Splain.

Just reread your own posts....