You Be The Judge: Anderson Vs Burk

[TJJJ]

Originally Posted by BrotherEastman

LOL! Okay, just for the point of clarification, who is a preterist and who is a futurist?

Well, it's like this as far as I can tell. Burke and Benincasa are full prets, Anderson and Epley are Full Futurists with partial partial pret leanings. Burke and Anderson are debating whether the Christ of Preterists is true or the Christ of Futurists is true. Either way I reckon, one side or the other is going to die lost! According to the other side anyway! It seems that some have made this salvational.

Sit back and watch the show.

Bring popcorn...


And pepsi....

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by TJJJ

Well, it's like this as far as I can tell. Burke and Benincasa are full prets, Anderson and Epley are Full Futurists with partial partial pret leanings. Burke and Anderson are debating whether the Christ of Preterists is true or the Christ of Futurists is true. Either way I reckon, one side or the other is going to die lost! According to the other side anyway! It seems that some have made this salvational.

Sit back and watch the show.

Bring popcorn...


And pepsi....

No, that's what we WERE supposed to debate. Bro. Anderson decided to talk about other issues, and to use "other apostles" for his sources.

[TK Burk]

So, Bro. Anderson, have you read enough commentaries from Liberty University that you're now ready to debate?

I am ready anytime you are....

[JN Anderson]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

So, Bro. Anderson, have you read enough commentaries from Liberty University that you're now ready to debate?

I am ready anytime you are....

You post ad hominem instead of answering the questions. Let's see, genetic fallacy, Red Herring, and now ad hominem.

I never quit the debate. I have been waiting on you to actually post a negative reply to my second statement. To actually post according to the debate format.

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by JN Anderson

You post ad hominem instead of answering the questions. Let's see, genetic fallacy, Red Herring, and now ad hominem.

I never quit the debate. I have been waiting on you to actually post a negative reply to my second statement. To actually post according to the debate format.

Really?? Didn't you post this?

"Praxeas, as far as I am concerned TKB cannot or will not answer the questions. I feel no need or motivation to continue in this debate. I am willing and able to answer any questions regarding any element of Futurism or Full Preterism that TKB could ask. I, however, feel this is a matter of principle and honestly would rather lurk or reply to other threads."

[rrford]

Originally Posted by TK Burk

Really?? Didn't you post this?

Ya know, your style is somewhat irrititating. Just sayin' is all. I mean, why do I have a feeling you are going to go off and claim some great victory and say that JA couldn't answer your questions when you never actually engaged in the debate correctly?

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by rrford

Ya know, your style is somewhat irrititating. Just sayin' is all. I mean, why do I have a feeling you are going to go off and claim some great victory and say that JA couldn't answer your questions when you never actually engaged in the debate correctly?

My style? He says things that never happened. He says he never quit when he did. And you're concerned with my style? And you claim I’m irritating? Why, for telling the truth?

How can I claim a victory over something that never actually began? I have repeatedly asked to continue with this debate as was first agreed. He has refused.

I think you might want to reread who it is that is saying he got the victory here because it's not me. All I’ve said was he never started doing what he said he would…and I am not the only one saying that.

[Evang.Benincasa]

"Praxeas, as far as I am concerned TKB cannot or will not answer the questions. I feel no need or motivation to continue in this debate. I am willing and able to answer any questions regarding any element of Futurism or Full Preterism that TKB could ask. I, however, feel this is a matter of principle and honestly would rather lurk or reply to other threads."

Good God in Zion! Brother Anderson did you say the above?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by JN Anderson

I never quit the debate. I have been waiting on you to actually post a negative reply to my second statement. To actually post according to the debate format.

"Praxeas, as far as I am concerned TKB cannot or will not answer the questions. I feel no need or motivation to continue in this debate. I am willing and able to answer any questions regarding any element of Futurism or Full Preterism that TKB could ask. I, however, feel this is a matter of principle and honestly would rather lurk or reply to other threads."

Brother James Anderson, what's up with the above?

[TK Burk]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

Brother James Anderson, what's up with the above?