TKB's only replies included an informal logical fallacy and the second was nothing more than copy and paste Red Herring. If TKB understood the rules he would also understand that his reply was invalid and my questions were DIRECTLY relevant to the Christ of Scripture and the pseudo-Christ of FP. TKB, this is laughable. There are questions on this very thread that you have IGNORED and have not answered. You realize their import however and keep repeating.
I don't feel like debating someone who is not genuinely interested in the content of the debate.
Here are those questions again. Explain to us how they are not RELEVANT.
Is there a difference in a Christ that has already come and one that has not?
Is there a difference between a Christ who came spiritually and one who came physically?
Is there even a difference between a God who pours His wrath only on Jerusalem and one who pours it out upon the world?
Please answer those questions directly and concisely as possible.
Here is another difference. To most Futurists the apocalyptic events of Armageddon, preceding the glorious Day of The Lord, the Millennium, during which the returned Christ will rule. In AFP however we find fulfillment of all these things in the judgment of Jerusalem in 70 AD. These CHRISTO-CENTRIC events have DIFFERENT meanings and outcomes. Is the Christ who came in 70 AD the same that Futurists look for in the future?
Another reason that AFP teaches a different Christ is our partaking of the Body and Blood of Christ. Believer partake of communion (the bread and the wine) today or at least until He comes (
1 Corinthians 11:26). In your view this is totally unnecessary since Christ has already come.
FP also has a problem with the physical body of Jesus Christ. Jesus physically rose from the dead and will physically return. If Christ was resurrected physically, where is His body now? If I am looking for this physical return of Christ and you are not, isn't that a difference between your Christ and mine? I say yes. For you to say so would be for you to lose the debate. You shouldn't have agree to it if you cannot answer the questions, as it was your responsibility to do in that portion of the debate. Instead TKB posits new material. Try another trick that ones old.
Linear Mode
