Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified
Why? Your own personal viewpoints--fine. But why collude with others first? Men need to stand on their own two feet, and if there are others who are like minded, why don't they stand up publicly with a backbone and support those who are already speaking out?
What is (was) being planned or "organized" that can't be done publicly? Why not open the doors to anyone?
|
MissB,
Your principles are great, and I cannot stand hidden agendas.
I didn't like it with the WPF, and I don't like it with this group.
However, I think you're missing the way things really work.
Since when is it a crime to hold a private meeting?
Should we create a new bylaw to prohibit private assembly without prior consent from the UPCI? To me, this is about control. Some men want to control the flow of information within the org, and want access to private meetings in order to manage the conversations and agenda.
That is borg theology. That is anti-Bible. That is wrong.
You say that these guys should push an agenda publicly?
How?
They are already being railroaded, demonized and castigated before they speak one word publicly. Can you imagine what would happen if they spewed their entire agenda?
Listen carefully, Sis.
Any movement that supresses critical thinking, prohibits private assembly and squelches inspection is in grave danger of becoming monolithic, cultic and irrelevant.
Threaded Mode
