Jesus' Blood is More Powerful than the Sin of Adam

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

Once again CJ abandons scripture for an emotional argument.

CJ the same argument can be said for all the children in this world that are raped, abused and killed...in fact those are the emotional arguments Atheists routinely make.

But it must be pointed out that although God is love, God can hate. He hated Esau and rejected him. The word of God does not support your position.

Please explain what the bolded part has to do with my post. Seems you are on autopilot, if I post you throw your standard ridiculous arguments out.

I shared a different translation of Romans 5:18-19 for consideration and discussion. You have a closed mind so why torture yourself??

UR is scripturally reasonable and supportable much more than ED, the idea that God will eternally torture His creation, or lose the vast majority of those created in His image, by annihilation should insult your intelligence.

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by crakjak

Please explain what the bolded part has to do with my post. Seems you are on autopilot, if I post you throw your standard ridiculous arguments out.

I shared a different translation of Romans 5:18-19 for consideration and discussion. You have a closed mind so why torture yourself??

UR is scripturally reasonable and supportable much more than ED, the idea that God will eternally torture His creation, or lose the vast majority of those created in His image, by annihilation should insult your intelligence.

CJ if being on autopilot means making ridiculous arguments the you are a jumbo jet liner on auto pilot.

The only closed mind is yours. You want discussion but when someone disagrees with and points out the flaw in your argument you become belligerent.

What insults my intelligence is someone trying to appeal to pity or emotions rather than a strong scriptural argument.

You can't stick to scriptures. The moment someone puts crimp in your scriptural argument you once again abandon scriptures and try to reason through emotional arguments.

If your argument is God is love, therefore God won't allow souls to be destroyed in hell then the same argument can be made God is love so God won't allow children to be raped, abused and murdered...yet it happens everyday.

What you are doing CJ is molding God after your own image, rather than accepting the God of the bible. God is love, yet that same God hated Esau.

Yet your paradigm has a God that could never hate Esau...because Esau is His creation and God is love therefore God loves Esau...sorry but the word says otherwise. What you are doing CJ, as I said before, is defining God after your own idea of what a God should be like. That is my opinion of what you are doing whether you realize you are doing it or not.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by Praxeas

CJ if being on autopilot means making ridiculous arguments the you are a jumbo jet liner on auto pilot.

The only closed mind is yours. You want discussion but when someone disagrees with and points out the flaw in your argument you become belligerent.

What insults my intelligence is someone trying to appeal to pity or emotions rather than a strong scriptural argument.

You can't stick to scriptures. The moment someone puts crimp in your scriptural argument you once again abandon scriptures and try to reason through emotional arguments.

If your argument is God is love, therefore God won't allow souls to be destroyed in hell then the same argument can be made God is love so God won't allow children to be raped, abused and murdered...yet it happens everyday.

What you are doing CJ is molding God after your own image, rather than accepting the God of the bible. God is love, yet that same God hated Esau.

Yet your paradigm has a God that could never hate Esau...because Esau is His creation and God is love therefore God loves Esau...sorry but the word says otherwise. What you are doing CJ, as I said before, is defining God after your own idea of what a God should be like. That is my opinion of what you are doing whether you realize you are doing it or not.

I will and have addressed any opposing scripture that you have or can present with reasonable and scriptural refutation. You of all folks should be careful of accusing someone of belligerence.

God never hated Esau in the sense that you present at all, have you not read Jacob's response to his brother at their reconciliation? I believe he said Esau's face was as the face of God, hard to believe he was so hated of God.

My definition of God is straight from the Word, it is tradition straight from the Roman apostate church, that believes that God will torture His creation for billions of years or burn them to a crisp? However, scripture clearly tells us that God hated the practice of Israel burning their children to the idol Molech. God said he never had such a thought. So, I am very confident in my view of God, He doesn't change so how is it possible that ED could be true?

His purpose of "saving the world" will not fail.

Good night, rest well!!