Taking the Bible Seriously But Not Literally

[Digging4Truth]

Originally Posted by jfrog

I never seen you do that. Not once. In fact I recall you going right along with us up until now.

This is your post #79. Can you find a post after this where you dropped your challenge?

In post #64 of this thread.

I was asked by you... "Are you saying we couldn't move these stones today if we wanted to" or some similar quote. And I responded to you by saying...

I'm saying that, in the year 2010, if we even have the ability to carve, move & place these stones it would require the very best of what we have to offer in the technologies of these fields.

There have been some examples given of machinery that could, in all probability, move & place these stones unharmed and each of these examples is the best we have to offer in the technologies of these fields.

When brought to a point of whether I was saying we could not move these stones I backed off of that stance.

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

In post #64 of this thread.

I was asked by you... "Are you saying we couldn't move these stones today if we wanted to" or some similar quote. And I responded to you by saying...



There have been some examples given of machinery that could, in all probability, move & place these stones unharmed and each of these examples is the best we have to offer in the technologies of these fields.

When brought to a point of whether I was saying we could not move these stones I backed off of that stance.

okay