The Cross of Christ Alone Can Save

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by pelathais

That's a pretty good example of your passive/aggressive approach to most of your forum postings Mike. You jump in saying things like,

"None of the One Steppers could ever explain..." and

"They just have no answers for ..." and

"Everyone who doesn't see it my way has no real education and is schtoopid!"

Then, after having turned up the heat to a boiling a temperature, you immediately start to whine whenever someone responds back to you in kind.

"Oh boy! You must really have anger management issues!" exclaims Mike... right after he has scornfully denigrated everyone else.

You're the classic mouthy little kid in the playground. You try and pick a fight wherever you go and when someone stands up to you, you immediately start crying, "Teeeacher!"

Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

Well, looks like you being a jerk to everyone that disagrees with you today... not just me. Same ol' lines too. Maybe you need to take a time-out?

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

Well, looks like you being a jerk to everyone that disagrees with you today... not just me. Same ol' lines too. Maybe you need to take a time-out?

I am a "sage" when you agree with me and a "jerk" when you don't. Your words. Sad.

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by pelathais

I am a "sage" when you agree with me and a "jerk" when you don't. Your words. Sad.

I thought of you as a sage However, as I explained in our private note (that you are so itching at the gills to share with the masses) I still think you're a really smart guy. But sages are those older types filled with wisdom. You seem to still enjoy a good brawl.

And don't misrepresent what I said. The "your words" was not "when you agree with me" and "when you don't." My disappointment with you was not because you disagreed. I do believe you are smart enough to realize that. But as irrational as you've been lately, I'll cut you some slack.

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by pelathais

I am a "sage" when you agree with me and a "jerk" when you don't. Your words. Sad.

I thought of you as a sage. But as I explained in our private note (that you are so itching at the gills to share with the masses) I still think you're a really smart guy. But sages are those older types filled with wisdom. You seem to still enjoy a good brawl.

And don't misrepresent what I said. The "your words" was not "when you agree with me" and "when you don't." My disappointment with you was not because you disagreed. I do believe you are smart enough to realize that. But as irrational as you've been lately, I'll cut you some slack.

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

I thought of you as a sage. But as I explained in our private note (that you are so itching at the gills to share with the masses) I still think you're a really smart guy. But sages are those older types filled with wisdom. You seem to still enjoy a good brawl.

And don't misrepresent what I said. The "your words" was not "when you agree with me" and "when you don't." My disappointment with you was not because you disagreed. I do believe you are smart enough to realize that. But as irrational as you've been lately, I'll cut you some slack.

Mrs. Richardson taught our First Grade class about quotation marks. Your words that I quoted were in quotation marks. This fact seems to have not escaped you; yet you still say that I misrepresented your words.

And, I won't embarass you further by posting the PMs. You've done enough for yourself. Why don't you call it an evening?

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by pelathais

Mrs. Richardson taught our First Grade class about quotation marks. Your words that I quoted were in quotation marks. This fact seems to have not escaped you; yet you still say that I misrepresented your words.

And, I won't embarass you further by posting the PMs. You've done enough for yourself. Why don't you call it an evening?

Embarrass me? You've already broke rules and shared private messages. I have nothing to hide. You are on a rampage. Feel free to do it. The majority of my comments to you were "hahahahahahahahaha."

What's the point? What do you want to prove tonight, Pel?

You correctly used the quotation marks with some rather implied commentary in-between. A passerby may get the wrong idea. So, let's just put it out there how it was rightly said, and not on how you chose to reinterpret what I said.

[pelathais]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

Embarrass me? You've already broke rules and shared private messages.

And just when was that?

Reality appears to be something ephemeral to you. You can't quite grasp or get a hold on it.

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

I have nothing to hide. You are on a rampage. Feel free to do it. The majority of my comments to you were "hahahahahahahahaha."

Too many repeated PMs with the frenetic nervous laughter.

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

What's the point? What do you want to prove tonight, Pel?

You correctly used the quotation marks with some rather implied commentary in-between. A passerby may get the wrong idea. So, let's just put it out there how it was rightly said, and not on how you chose to reinterpret what I said.

You said what I have already characterized you as saying, and then you repeated it. The context of the "sage" remark was concerning my posts in this thread, a thread that you now malign. Yet I have been as frank and "fun" here as I was on that thread about AZ's SB1070.

The context of the "jerk" comment was your realization in that thread that I probably don't agree with you about everything and that I have little patience for those who seem to need to post ... frenetically.

It suddenly occurs to me that I also appear to have dropped in your esteem when you discovered that I was not as wealthy financially as you had for some reason imagined.

"HAHAHAHAHAHAHA" ?

[Jeffrey]

Too many repeated PMs with the frenetic nervous laughter.

Is that how you interpreted it? hahahahahahahahahaa

You said what I have already characterized you as saying, and then you repeated it. The context of the "sage" remark was concerning my posts in this thread, a thread that you now malign. Yet I have been as frank and "fun" here as I was on thread that about AZ's SB1070.

You've been so fun that Admin got involved and locked the thread.

The context of the "jerk" comment was your realization in that thread that I probably don't agree with you about everything and that I have little patience for those who seem to need to post ... frenetically.

Nice try. You really truly believe (all your irrationality aside) I think your a jerk because you don't agree with me?

[Jeffrey]

Originally Posted by pelathais

It suddenly occurs to me that I also appear to have dropped in your esteem when you discovered that I was not as wealthy financially as you had for some reason imagined.

"HAHAHAHAHAHAHA" ?

Your last remark... huh?
I could careless if you were a bazillionnaire or living on a shoe string budget.
This whole day has been so unlike you. Are you really Pel? Who has hijacked your screen name?

I am concerned about the implications of the bill and don't think it's a reactive response, not a solution. Sorry we disagree.

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by Jeffrey

I thought of you as a sage. But as I explained in our private note (that you are so itching at the gills to share with the masses) I still think you're a really smart guy. But sages are those older types filled with wisdom. You seem to still enjoy a good brawl.

And don't misrepresent what I said. The "your words" was not "when you agree with me" and "when you don't." My disappointment with you was not because you disagreed. I do believe you are smart enough to realize that. But as irrational as you've been lately, I'll cut you some slack.

I only took it as him saying that you called him both a sage and a jerk. It didn't seem to be misrepresented to me, at least, not from my point of view.