For those that left the UPC...

[Aquila]

Men wore skits throughout the 1500's. Soldiers also had skirted uniforms. The Scottish men have worn kilts. All were distinctly masculine.

If a Scottish woman wears a kilt, she's wearing men's apparel.

[faithit166]

the word skirt in hebrew is kanaph strongs 3671 it means edge or extremity.hem men did not wear skirts back in the day

[*AQuietPlace*]

Originally Posted by faithit166

the word skirt in hebrew is kanaph strongs 3671 it means edge or extremity.hem men did not wear skirts back in the day

So you think men in the Bible wore pants/trousers?

[faithit166]

Originally Posted by *AQuietPlace*

So you think men in the Bible wore pants/trousers?

absolutely,they were called breeches,exodus 28;42 And thou shalt make them linen breeches to cover their nakedness from the loins even unto the thighs they shall reach and they shall be upon aaron and upon his sons when they come into the tabernacle of the congregation or when they come near unto the altar to minister in the holy place that they bare not iniquity and die it shall be a statute forever unto him and his seed after him,so absolutely yes they wore breeches in strongs concordone breeches are described as underwear drawers or trousers 2 a priestly undergarment, i ran across this site if youre interested in reading some god bless http://christianhospitality.org/chweb/clothes.pdf

[*AQuietPlace*]

Originally Posted by faithit166

absolutely,they were called breeches,exodus 28;42 And thou shalt make them linen breeches to cover their nakedness from the loins even unto the thighs they shall reach and they shall be upon aaron and upon his sons when they come into the tabernacle of the congregation or when they come near unto the altar to minister in the holy place that they bare not iniquity and die it shall be a statute forever unto him and his seed after him,so absolutely yes they wore breeches in strongs concordone breeches are described as underwear drawers or trousers 2 a priestly undergarment, i ran across this site if youre interested in reading some god bless http://christianhospitality.org/chweb/clothes.pdf

Yes, those were undergarments that priests wore.

Men wore robes. Men and women wore robes.

[SavedLou]

Originally Posted by faithit166

absolutely,they were called breeches,exodus 28;42 And thou shalt make them linen breeches to cover their nakedness from the loins even unto the thighs they shall reach and they shall be upon aaron and upon his sons when they come into the tabernacle of the congregation or when they come near unto the altar to minister in the holy place that they bare not iniquity and die it shall be a statute forever unto him and his seed after him,so absolutely yes they wore breeches in strongs concordone breeches are described as underwear drawers or trousers 2 a priestly undergarment, i ran across this site if youre interested in reading some god bless http://christianhospitality.org/chweb/clothes.pdf

So...basically they wore underwear right?
I certainly understand the fact that those men wore undergarments (under their robes) but it's not a valid argument for pants vs skirts. If anything, the commandment for women to not wear "garments that pertaineth to a man" may actually mean women shouldn't wear underwear. Maybe we should all be wearing robes, some of us going commando and others not! ??? LOL

I've heard it debated that women should wear skirts and men pants b/c the types of robes were different for men and women, but that would also hold true for both types of pants today.

[onefaith2]

Originally Posted by SavedLou

So...basically they wore underwear right?
I certainly understand the fact that those men wore undergarments (under their robes) but it's not a valid argument for pants vs skirts. If anything, the commandment for women to not wear "garments that pertaineth to a man" may actually mean women shouldn't wear underwear. Maybe we should all be wearing robes, some of us going commando and others not! ??? LOL

I've heard it debated that women should wear skirts and men pants b/c the types of robes were different for men and women, but that would also hold true for both types of pants today.

We know that the robes (if thats what they wore.. lol) would have to be significantly different so that even from a distance you could tell them apart. Something that is an abomination in the law could not have allowed otherwise.

(think harlots caught had to wear certain garments that distinguished them)

[Godsdrummer]

Originally Posted by onefaith2

We know that the robes (if thats what they wore.. lol) would have to be significantly different so that even from a distance you could tell them apart. Something that is an abomination in the law could not have allowed otherwise.

(think harlots caught had to wear certain garments that distinguished them)

onefaith

Before you make statements you can't back up you need to study history and quit assuming that what you have been told by pastors and other to keep the saints under the unbiblical pastoral authority is true.

Savelou

Keep studing and praying God is directing you to the place you will feel comfertable serving him. My whole family went through the same thing a few years ago. Now all my children are in good churches and growing in the spirit.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Aquila

Men wore skits throughout the 1500's. Soldiers also had skirted uniforms. The Scottish men have worn kilts. All were distinctly masculine.

If a Scottish woman wears a kilt, she's wearing men's apparel.

That is too logical for some to grasp, though.