Quote:
Originally Posted by faithit166
absolutely,they were called breeches,exodus 28;42 And thou shalt make them linen breeches to cover their nakedness from the loins even unto the thighs they shall reach and they shall be upon aaron and upon his sons when they come into the tabernacle of the congregation or when they come near unto the altar to minister in the holy place that they bare not iniquity and die it shall be a statute forever unto him and his seed after him,so absolutely yes they wore breeches in strongs concordone breeches are described as underwear drawers or trousers 2 a priestly undergarment, i ran across this site if youre interested in reading some god bless http://christianhospitality.org/chweb/clothes.pdf |
So...basically they wore underwear right?
I certainly understand the fact that those men wore undergarments (under their robes) but it's not a valid argument for pants vs skirts. If anything, the commandment for women to not wear "garments that pertaineth to a man" may actually mean women shouldn't wear underwear. Maybe we should all be wearing robes, some of us going commando and others not! ??? LOL
I've heard it debated that women should wear skirts and men pants b/c the types of robes were
different for men and women, but that would also hold true for both types of pants today.
Threaded Mode
