Has evolutionism become a leading religion?

[coadie]

Originally Posted by crakjak

Coadie,

Have you read Gerald Schroeder's book, "The Science of God", you can't just fluff off all of science as fraudulent? Schroeder uses the original Hebrew language of scripture to bring science and scripture together. You cannot use scripture alone to define God in the creation, there is plenty of junk science, but there is also plenty of junk theology.

Schroeder is a physicist, and he is a Hebrew scholar, very interesting studies, he presents God as the Creator. He believes science shows us how God created. He is a brilliant scientist as well as a brilliant biblical scholar.

Other books by Schroeder: "The Hidden Face of God", helps us to see God in the creation of man. "Genesis and the Big Bang", brings the six days of creation and the 14 billion year age of the cosmos together. "God According to God", uses scripture in the early languages, and ancient scholars to help see God more clearly.

Does he have it all correct? Maybe not, but I believe he has many things about right.

fluff off all of science as fraudulent

Where did you come up with that?

Gerald Schroeder's book? He is a physicist. He didn't study biochemistry.

Why would I read about stars to find out that DNA is the fingerprint of information being passed along in life?

planetary sciences not the same as plant science.

I will mess with you. With out google, can you explain junk DNA? Can you live without it?

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by coadie

Where did you come up with that?

Gerald Schroeder's book? He is a physicist. He didn't study biochemistry.

Why would I read about stars to find out that DNA is the fingerprint of information being passed along in life?

planetary sciences not the same as plant science.

I will mess with you. With out google, can you explain junk DNA? Can you live without it?

See what I mean!!! You throw out sound bites, but you assume a scientist like Schroeder has nothing to say. You are incoherent!

Sorry, I asked anything of you, you are so smart no one can carry on a discussion with you. Be blessed, I have better things to do.

[coadie]

Originally Posted by crakjak

See what I mean!!! You throw out sound bites, but you assume a scientist like Schroeder has nothing to say. You are incoherent!

Sorry, I asked anything of you, you are so smart no one can carry on a discussion with you. Be blessed, I have better things to do.

I will keep is real simple. Real simple. Schroeder is into physics. Nothing wrong with that. evolution is about changes of frequencies of occurrence of alleles in populations over generations. Schroeder works with a telescope and biology uses the opposite a microscope.

Schroeder is a waste of time regarding evolution. As a PHD at MIT he uses the exact same math I use and if he is a little older also had to write some of his own programs for calculations in Fortran
before canned software came along after my time.

You said

can't just fluff off all of science as fraudulent

What a bogus claim. It is about as bad as Pelthais saying apostoilics are insane if they don't buy into darwinian evolution. But I can tell you that evolution theory is a soft science and mostly extrapolation and not observable.

Pelthais is surely not prepared to addmit criteria for diagnosis and placement in an asylum were where people are insane and can't take care of themselves.

[crakjak]

Originally Posted by coadie

I will keep is real simple. Real simple. Schroeder is into physics. Nothing wrong with that. evolution is about changes of frequencies of occurrence of alleles in populations over generations. Schroeder works with a telescope and biology uses the opposite a microscope.

Schroeder is a waste of time regarding evolution. As a PHD at MIT he uses the exact same math I use and if he is a little older also had to write some of his own programs for calculations in Fortran
before canned software came along after my time.

You said


What a bogus claim. It is about as bad as Pelthais saying apostoilics are insane if they don't buy into darwinian evolution. But I can tell you that evolution theory is a soft science and mostly extrapolation and not observable.

Pelthais is surely not prepared to addmit criteria for diagnosis and placement in an asylum were where people are insane and can't take care of themselves.

Schroeder has a PhD in both physics and earth sciences, He does not believe in Darwinian evolution. If you haven't read his books, you don't have a clue to his qualifications to this subject.

God is to be discovered in His creation, if you don't study the earth sciences, you will not know much about God. The creation is his masterpiece, and He is very embedded in His creation.

You are wasting your time refuting evolution, science is way past Darwinian evolution, only the atheist are hung up on it. Evolution is true, just not in the Darwinian definition. Life suddenly appeared, way too fast and too advanced, for Darwin theory.