Things That Aren't In The Bible...

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

So... what accompanies salvation?

I'm trying to get your interpretation.

I will let Adam Clarke say it since he said it best.

Things that accompany salvation - Τα εχομενα σωτηριας· Things that are suitable to a state of salvation; you give proofs still that you have not, whatever others have done, departed from the living God. Several of your brethren have already apostatized, and the whole nation is in a state of rebellion against God; and, in consequence of their final rejection of Christ and his Gospel, are about to be finally rejected by God. They must meet with destruction; they have the things that are suitable to, and indicative of, a state of reprobation; the wrath of God will come upon them to the uttermost; but, while they meet with destruction, you shall meet with salvation. It is worthy of remark, that no genuine Christian perished in the destruction of Jerusalem; they all, previously to the siege by Titus, escaped to Pella, in Coelosyria; and it is as remarkable that not one Jew escaped! all either fell by the sword, perished by famine, or were led into captivity! According to their own imprecation, His blood be upon us and our children, God visited and avenged the innocent blood of Christ upon them and upon their posterity; and they continue to be monuments of his displeasure to the present day.

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

Two pages and nobody even notices that this one IS in there.

Evidently, they all know it's there, they just don't know what to do with it!!

No classes today?

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by mfblume

I will let Adam Clarke say it since he said it best.

Things that accompany salvation - Τα εχομενα σωτηριας· Things that are suitable to a state of salvation; you give proofs still that you have not, whatever others have done, departed from the living God. Several of your brethren have already apostatized, and the whole nation is in a state of rebellion against God; and, in consequence of their final rejection of Christ and his Gospel, are about to be finally rejected by God. They must meet with destruction; they have the things that are suitable to, and indicative of, a state of reprobation; the wrath of God will come upon them to the uttermost; but, while they meet with destruction, you shall meet with salvation. It is worthy of remark, that no genuine Christian perished in the destruction of Jerusalem; they all, previously to the siege by Titus, escaped to Pella, in Coelosyria; and it is as remarkable that not one Jew escaped! all either fell by the sword, perished by famine, or were led into captivity! According to their own imprecation, His blood be upon us and our children, God visited and avenged the innocent blood of Christ upon them and upon their posterity; and they continue to be monuments of his displeasure to the present day.

Adam Clarke was a trinitarian that believe in salvation by confession. I wouldn't trust anything this false prophet had to say.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by notofworks

Adam Clarke was a trinitarian that believe in salvation by confession. I wouldn't trust anything this false prophet had to say.

...Only when he disagrees with you on something, even through your TIC moments. lol

[Baron1710]

Originally Posted by notofworks

Evidently, they all know it's there, they just don't know what to do with it!!

No classes today?

In between.

What do you do with that verse anyway...believe it? Or explain it away?

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by mfblume

...Only when he disagrees with you on something, even through your TIC moments. lol

It was simply an observation about how you and many oneness pentecostals use people like Clarke to further your education, and then toss them in the eternal dumpster of hell because their doctrine is all wrong.

I used to hear books promoted at General Conference and we were told to, "Eat the meat and spit out the bones." What a joke.

Here's something that rhetorically IS in the bible......"Does a spring of water bubble out with both fresh water and bitter water?"

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by Baron1710

In between.

What do you do with that verse anyway...believe it? Or explain it away?

Well, just like Matthew 28:19 and I John 5:7, it was probably mistranslated.

[mfblume]

Originally Posted by notofworks

It was simply an observation about how you and many oneness pentecostals use people like Clarke to further your education, and then toss them in the eternal dumpster of hell because their doctrine is all wrong.

Here you totally ignored what I said on the other thread about tongues when I said I do not cast anyone into hell who is seeking Christ sincerely. You mock that as though I do not know what I believe, and then turn around and discard it and accuse me of totally the opposite when you cannot explain a passage in question yourself.

I used to hear books promoted at General Conference and we were told to, "Eat the meat and spit out the bones." What a joke.

Here's something that rhetorically IS in the bible......"Does a spring of water bubble out with both fresh water and bitter water?"

It would be nice to see you treat other believers who disagree with you as well as you treat atheists and agnostics. Love for believers is a great concern to the Lord as much as for anyone else in the Word. Let's talk about REAL grace.

So, amen to "Does a spring of water bubble out with both fresh water and bitter water?"

[OneAccord]

Originally Posted by RandyWayne

This may just be myth but I heard repeatedly that Revelations only made it in the official canon by one vote.

Ok, Randy, pay attention.

The Book of Revelations is NOT in the Bible.

The Book of Revelation is. It is the Book of REVELATION of Jesus Christ to Saint John.

[mfblume]

LOL. I was just going to say BOOK OF REVELATIONS is not in the bible, ether.