Quote:
Originally Posted by mfblume
That is not dealing with the issue of the two points I mentioned, which is what I meant by the flaw in my thought.
a) It is easy to not deal with the actual issue and point out a flaw, but the only real way you can show a flaw in this is to show me the flaw in the following:
1) [B] b) One-Steppers are right when they say the bible does not actually say ONE MUST speak in tongues when receiving the Spirit in any form.[/B
]2) c) Three-Steppers are right when they say the Bible does NOT declare there are two different experiences with the Holy Ghost (one at salvation and a subsequent baptism after salvation). |
a) It was not my intent to dodge the issue or to point out flaws just for the sake of pointing out flaws.
b) I will find scriptural support for this.
c) You may be right, but we both know of scriptures where it talks about people being filled with the Spirit without speaking in tongues. Still, your wording presents a challenge and I will attempt to "settle it" using scripture.
Threaded Mode
