Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd
I realize we have moved past the point but this needs to be clarified.
Apostolic Doctrine is not what I am talking about.
What I said was that we ought to be able to recognize that within a certain level of orthodoxy here should be room for the very differnt views.
Both the Neo-PCI view and the very conservative Water/Spirit Holiness Standards veiws should be seen as within that orthodoxy. At least where AFF is concerned and these things all fall well within the terms set out in the rules here.
Members ought to be able to discus/debate the different views within that orthodoxy without resorting (on both sides) to calling each other heritics.
When I say what is Apostolic as far as AFF goes, isnt up for debate, I mean that NEITHER side should be allowed to stake a claim that they are apostolic to the exclusion of ohthers witin the orthodoxy that makes up AFF.
THIS is what is out of kilter. This is where things will have to change before many of us come back and post more often.
I do not believe it will change.
|
I agree with everything except the last sentence.
I believe it COULD change.
Threaded Mode
