|
Tab Menu 1
| Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun! |
 |
|
02-03-2011, 12:40 PM
|
 |
Registered Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,206
|
|
|
Re: Full Compliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socialite
(and of course this post is all in jest  ) |
CHICKEN...... You know you were serious! 
Been Thinkin
__________________
"From the time you're born, 'til you ride in the hearse, there ain't nothing bad that couldn't be worse!"
LIFE: Some days you're the dog and some days you're the hydrant! 
I have ... Hippopotomonstrosesquipedaliophobia! The fear of long words.
"Prediction is very hard, especially about the future." - Yogi Berra
"I love the man that can smile in trouble, that can gather strength from distress, and grow brave in reflection." - Thomas Paine
|
02-03-2011, 12:42 PM
|
 |
Ravaged by Grace
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,948
|
|
|
Re: Full Compliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socialite
AFF has been somewhat explicit about desiring to better enforcement the AFF rules of engagement, and have dutifully responded to flagged posts, inflammatory posts (ones they thought were inflammatory ), etc.
If we want to really be serious about this, it's time to edit our emoticons. Those things are worse than words! 
For example, there's the Big Baby, one of my personal faves to use for whiners:
There's the violent emoticon 
There's the unkind "laughing at you"
The condescending "pat" 
The sexually harrassing lovey ones 
The annoying 
The threatening   
The bitter 
The biggoted anti-old people one 
Did I say threats already? 
The rude 
The scheming 
The gossipy 
The insensitive 
The racist 
and....
The idolatrous  |
Are you accusing the Forum of speaking out of both sides of their mouths??
If so, I agree with you.
__________________
You know you miss me
|
02-03-2011, 12:42 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,280
|
|
|
Re: Full Compliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by notofworks
Are you accusing the Forum of speaking out of both sides of their mouths??
If so, I agree with you.
|
No, just that they are setting us up for failure.
I mean this is quite an arsenal!
|
02-03-2011, 12:44 PM
|
|
Ravaged by Grace
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,948
|
|
|
Re: Full Compliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by Socialite
(and of course this post is all in jest ) |
Hogwash. You're 100% serious and you should be. An infraction can be issued for calling someone ignorant, yet I am provided with, by the Forum, this smilie.......
__________________
You know you miss me
|
02-03-2011, 12:49 PM
|
 |
Jellybean!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,996
|
|
|
Re: Full Compliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by notofworks
Hogwash. You're 100% serious and you should be. An infraction can be issued for calling someone ignorant, yet I am provided with, by the Forum, this smilie....... |
As long as you don't use it in a sentence such as this:
'I think you are ' you'll be fine. 
You can use that smiley for many other various uses other than to mock or ridicule another member. 
__________________
 'Some folk don't understand that the middle "F" in AFF is the most important ingredient!' -noeticknight |
02-03-2011, 01:14 PM
|
 |
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
|
Re: Full Compliance
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
02-03-2011, 01:19 PM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,351
|
|
|
Re: Full Compliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by notofworks
Are you accusing the Forum of speaking out of both sides of their mouths??
If so, I agree with you.
|
|
02-03-2011, 01:33 PM
|
|
Ravaged by Grace
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7,948
|
|
|
Re: Full Compliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Mrs
As long as you don't use it in a sentence such as this:
'I think you are ' you'll be fine.
You can use that smiley for many other various uses other than to mock or ridicule another member. |
Ok, I consider myself highly skilled, in fact, an expert, in avoiding infractions. It took me a while but I figured it out. Since I figured out the name-calling/infraction game, I've only received the infractions I wanted. Here recently, I basically begged for one because I wanted to know if there was a change in the AFF climate (and learned there was). So, if I say, "You're an idiot", I'm going to get an infraction....well, unless I said it to Coadie. However, if I say, "Be careful, you're starting to sound like an idiot", I'm squeaky clean.
But I see here it's possible that I can actually add to my name-calling/insult arsenal. For example, if I say, "The Forum's obsession this week with taking away my ability to comment about the validity of baptism in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is theologically irresponsible", I'm going to get an infraction.
BUT.....if I say, "I think the Forum's obsession this week with taking away my ability to comment about the validity of baptism in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is theologically irresponsible", I'm off the hook?
I LOVE IT!! This could open up a while new world to me! 
__________________
You know you miss me
|
02-03-2011, 01:39 PM
|
 |
My Family!
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 31,786
|
|
|
Re: Full Compliance
__________________
Master of Science in Applied Disgruntled Religious Theorist Wrangling
PhD in Petulant Tantrum Quelling
Dean of the School of Hard Knocks
|
02-03-2011, 01:39 PM
|
|
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
|
|
|
Re: Full Compliance
Quote:
Originally Posted by notofworks
Ok, I consider myself highly skilled, in fact, an expert, in avoiding infractions. It took me a while but I figured it out. Since I figured out the name-calling/infraction game, I've only received the infractions I wanted. Here recently, I basically begged for one because I wanted to know if there was a change in the AFF climate (and learned there was). So, if I say, "You're an idiot", I'm going to get an infraction....well, unless I said it to Coadie. However, if I say, "Be careful, you're starting to sound like an idiot", I'm squeaky clean.
But I see here it's possible that I can actually add to my name-calling/insult arsenal. For example, if I say, "The Forum's obsession this week with taking away my ability to comment about the validity of baptism in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is theologically irresponsible", I'm going to get an infraction.
BUT.....if I say, "I think the Forum's obsession this week with taking away my ability to comment about the validity of baptism in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is theologically irresponsible", I'm off the hook?
I LOVE IT!! This could open up a while new world to me! |
Hey it could be - depending on how small your world really is...
Your baptismal question is not off limits BTW, just needs to happen in the proper designated area. If I remember it was asked that you have that discussion in the debate area. So enjoy!
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005
I am a firm believer in the Old Paths
Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945
"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 PM.
| |
finding nothing, he instead asked his FRIENDS to chill out and enjoy the benefits of said forum.
Linear Mode
