Do You Believe In Women Preachers?

[rdp]

Originally Posted by Socialite

There's no logical fallacy here -- what are you talking about?

Prax's point is that there are some things "commanded" as a way of culture. You can refute why 1 Tim 2 is not to be refuted as cultural, but Prax's point is a legitimate point to interact on IMO.

It's not "legitimate" in the least & the fact that you defend it demonstrates that you need to study a bit further into hermeneutics. It IS an equivocation fallacy to compare the greeting principle w/ God's order of creation [not to mention the 'glory of man' instructing man!]...no matter how ya'll beller' that it's not.

Sorry Charlie...no comparison....& according to this view, then we should relegate the entire Bible to "culturally relevant"....will Y-O-U guys be "consistent" & apply the same criteria that you do to the "kiss" to entire Bible. I doubt it, so ya' might wanna' practice the ministry of the mirror before you talk to me about "consistency"!!