The Slippery Emergent Slope

[Raven]

Originally Posted by Socialite

Ha... this topic has blew up the social networking sites today. Rebukes publicly by John Piper, Gospel Coalition and Driscoll.

Makes me actually feel sorry for Crakjak. As much as I think Universalism is not biblically accurate, I do not believe how one views final states a matter of Gospel. At least I don't think so. Many are ignorantly grouping Unitarianism and Universalism together (probably because they both believe that the end of man either way is the same) -- but Unitarianism does not preach Christ exclusively.

Don't you go and worry about Crakjak. He's my brother and he's just fine!

[Cindy]

Originally Posted by noeticknight

Everybody must be on the Artificial Intelligence Forum tonight.

[DaveC519]

Is it really God's plan to send, maybe, 80+% of the earth to hell? I struggle with that.

Yeah. Just imagine how much God struggles with it (Ezek 33:11).

[Socialite]

Originally Posted by Pastor Keith

For once, we have a actual test case proving the slipperly slope that all the conservatives believed about the emergent group.

Sad, I actually like Rob and some of his stuff. The remedy, You can't go wrong with the main and plain.

I think Guys like Bell go to an extreme representing the Priestly side of ministry (human towards God) while negating the Prophetic (God's word towards man).

I hope that God has a wide mercy, but I can only reflect what God says in His Word.

http://being-the-body.blogspot.com/2...love-wins.html

http://networkedblogs.com/eNY8W

The conclusion was formed based on a trailer, not a read of the book.

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by Pastor Keith

At least with the Light Doctrine there is the requirement of faith in Jesus for Salvation.

Then evidently, I don't understand the "Light Doctrine", which is entirely possible because I'd never heard of it until a few months ago...I'm not well-informed with that stuff.

[Apprehended]

ART Bell in disguise?

Just doing my part to let Socialite know that his/her thread is not unnoticed.

[Socialite]

Originally Posted by Apprehended

ART Bell in disguise?

Just doing my part to let Socialite know that his/her thread is not unnoticed.

[Sam]

Originally Posted by notofworks

Then evidently, I don't understand the "Light Doctrine", which is entirely possible because I'd never heard of it until a few months ago...I'm not well-informed with that stuff.

I thought "light doctrine" was taught by Clyde Haney at WABC and continued on through his son and the new school name.

[notofworks]

Originally Posted by notofworks

Then evidently, I don't understand the "Light Doctrine", which is entirely possible because I'd never heard of it until a few months ago...I'm not well-informed with that stuff.

Ok, evidently, I don't understand the "Light Doctrine." Not surprised. I study the bible, hallelujah, not all this false doctrine history!

Showing my ignorance here, but what is the belief that those in the world who are "following the light they see" will be saved? I've heard Billy Graham espouse it and quite a few others.

Just wondering why there's no outcry about Graham? Is it because Bell is a "Seeker-Emergent" guy? Everyone just LOVES to bash these guys.

[Socialite]

Originally Posted by notofworks

Ok, evidently, I don't understand the "Light Doctrine." Not surprised. I study the bible, hallelujah, not all this false doctrine history!

Showing my ignorance here, but what is the belief that those in the world who are "following the light they see" will be saved? I've heard Billy Graham espouse it and quite a few others.

Just wondering why there's no outcry about Graham? Is it because Bell is a "Seeker-Emergent" guy? Everyone just LOVES to bash these guys.

NOW, never heard of that from Graham, Haney or others outside of them believing in Jesus for salvation. I always heard it used as a way to explain how some would "make it" without speaking in tongues, and being water baptized in Jesus Name -- and complying with all "holiness rules."