Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrog
Which gets back to my argument. It doesn't matter if there is a long form BC or not because the absence of a long form BC is not proof that he was not born in Hawaii.
With that said, the presence of his COLB certainly shows Hawaii stating it's a fact that he was born there. In fact, Hawaii has considered it a fact that he was born there ever since April 8, 1961 (the date his birth was filed by the hawaian registrar).
So, my question is what evidence do you have that Hawaii was wrong in issuing him a COLB that says he was born there? I'm not asking about possibilities and suppositions about how Hawaii MIGHT HAVE been wrong to issue him a COLB saying he was born there (because I know that I could offer legit possibilities and suppositions for any person, that they were not born where there COLB said they was). So I'm not wanting possibilities and suppositions, I am wanting evidence. Do you have any?
|
Frog,
Hawaii's Governor, back in January, said efforts were still being made to track down definitive vital records that would prove Obama was born in Hawaii.
Don't you find that strange? That is why Donald wants him investigated.
Threaded Mode
