Loud and Clear: thatsabortion.com

[jfrog]

Originally Posted by Digging4Truth

Agreed completely. That is why I searched through the thread to see what she was offended by. Offended by assumptions maybe? Offended by people taking raw numbers without considering that there or other circumstances involved even.

But she said...



According to the stats given. This is true.

As you have said... raw facts aren't the whole story. There is more to it than just numbers. That is why I was intrigued about what she might find offensive and, per her post, it appears to be the raw data that offends her.

I might be misconstruing her post as the "but" in her sentence seems to be a typo or lack of punctuation makes it unclear as to what is exactly being said. It's hard to tell.

But my initial reading of the post leads one to believe she is upset at the raw data and I find that a little amazing.

My initial reading was that she was upset that people were bringing those raw facts into this as if they proved something relating to the position of this thread.