Quote:
Originally Posted by BrotherEastman
just wondering what you're trying to say. lol What other apparel was there that was just pertaining to men at the time LUKE? they had robes right?  |
wow nice logic... so I guess the second part of
Deut 22:5 is pointless.... Men could not wear something they already did since no difference existed in normal clothing of men and women. Oh wait if geber is strictly warriors... it would only refer to warriors and the regular guy could do what he wanted. eehh but since he dressed already with no distinction... pffft Then you have all women would be prohibited but only certain men. Which would somehow mean they could not wear the norm? LOL In the end with your logic of course that would mean they never had any distinction at all, as they daily crossdressed since men dressed like women without distinction as it was just robes... eehhh except for those warriors. yeah... that text makes a lot of sense now.
Threaded Mode
