From the guy who declared Sabellius was not found in the Post Nicene Fathers and I gave him the page numbers. "Facts" are not your thing.
You're "running away" Steve-O. I've got you "boxed in," as you say.
Everyone has already read what I really said about Sabellius. They are also now anxiously awaiting your "ample evidence."
C'mon Steve. At least give us your "ample evidence" about how Sabellius preached your "doctrine." So far, your "ample evidence" consists of "... did too."
You're "running away" Steve-O. I've got you "boxed in," as you say.
Everyone has already read what I really said about Sabellius. They are also now anxiously awaiting your "ample evidence."
C'mon Steve. At least give us your "ample evidence" about how Sabellius preached your "doctrine." So far, your "ample evidence" consists of "... did too."
How do you manage to look at yourself in the mirror?
You could easily shut me down by simply delivering on your boast of having "ample evidence." Instead you dance around and make silly disingenuous accusations and assertions.
So... just where is that "ample evidence?" You've shown that you don't even have a clue as to what Sabellius taught - you couldn't even spell his name correctly until I sounded it out for you.
Where's the "ample evidence" Steve-O. You know what? From now on it will be "Steve-0," at least until you summon up some courage to back up your boasts.
How do you manage to look at yourself in the mirror?
You could easily shut me down by simply delivering on your boast of having "ample evidence." Instead you dance around and make silly disingenuous accusations and assertions.
So... just where is that "ample evidence?" You've shown that you don't even have a clue as to what Sabellius taught - you couldn't even spell his name correctly until I sounded it out for you.
Where's the "ample evidence" Steve-O. You know what? From now on it will be "Steve-0," at least until you summon up some courage to back up your boasts.
From the authority who said Sabellius was not in the Post Nicene Fathers. Your credentials are weighed in the balance and found non-existant. Bless your heart.
Bro Pel and Bro Epley, I can just imagine you guys playing a game of checkers together in an old time general store, teasing each other the whole time, and thoroughly enjoying the banter.
__________________
All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost. ~Tolkien
That's what everyone was saying about Tom Fudge. That Fudge was even an "Anglican priest." Turns out that the truth of the matter was far, far different.
Come on, humor me, and explain yourself.
Are you saying that Thomas Fudge is no longer an Anglican?
I bet the fine folks at St. Anne's Episcopal Church would be surprised to find out that the good doctor looking after their adult education program is not Anglican.
__________________
". . . as I suspect was true for those teaching Scriptures, I found that my students often felt they knew the Constitution without having really read it. They were accustomed to picking out phrases that they'd heard and using them to bolster their immediate arguments, or ignoring passages that seemed to contradict their views." Barack Obama in "The Audacity of Hope"
Are you saying that Thomas Fudge is no longer an Anglican?
I bet the fine folks at St. Anne's Episcopal Church would be surprised to find out that the good doctor looking after their adult education program is not Anglican.
oops
__________________ If I do something stupid blame the Lortab!
From the authority who said Sabellius was not in the Post Nicene Fathers. Your credentials are weighed in the balance and found non-existant. Bless your heart.
LOL. And you lie like a rug.
I was the one who taught you how to spell Sabellius. I said he didn't LIVE in the Post Nicene time period. Put down the crack pipe and sober up.
Where's that "ample evidence?" Just come out and admit it - NO ONE preached what you preach between the years 200-225 AD and 1899. No one.
Your doctrine is a lie. You can only support it by lying. So sit there in your lonely isolation. It won't be long before you'll have to give some straight answers to One Who will not put up with your lies.
Are you saying that Thomas Fudge is no longer an Anglican?
I bet the fine folks at St. Anne's Episcopal Church would be surprised to find out that the good doctor looking after their adult education program is not Anglican.
See my reply to this identical post on that other thread.
So sit there in your lonely isolation. It won't be long before you'll have to give some straight answers to One Who will not put up with your lies.
Linear Mode
