Crazy Stuff from Reckart followers and their leade - Page 13

houston · #1 08-24-2013, 07:37 PM

There is nothing beyond Partial. That is why it is refered to as ORTHODOX Preterism.

RandyWayne · #2 08-24-2013, 07:45 PM

The current bug up his panties seems to be disproving the 'Yahweh' (and it's 10 different spellings) movement. At least based on the last few dozen Facebook posts on his timeline. I WILL say that he seems to have a heart for the homeless, whether that is genuine or a source of members. . . . I'll have to assume it is genuine.

Evang.Benincasa · #3 08-24-2013, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyWayne

The current bug up his panties seems to be disproving the 'Yahweh' (and it's 10 different spellings) movement.

So, that is what we need to defend the huddled masses from?

Evang.Benincasa · #4 08-24-2013, 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyWayne

I WILL say that he seems to have a heart for the homeless, whether that is genuine or a source of members. . . . I'll have to assume it is genuine.

Brother Reckart's work with people in his community (I believe) is genuine.

houston · #5 08-24-2013, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandyWayne

The current bug up his panties seems to be disproving the 'Yahweh' (and it's 10 different spellings) movement. At least based on the last few dozen Facebook posts on his timeline. I WILL say that he seems to have a heart for the homeless, whether that is genuine or a source of members. . . . I'll have to assume it is genuine.

Genuine. We spoke about it briefly in a phone call almost 2 years ago. He loves people. It is his way with words that makes people think otherwise.

I have the same problem.

Abiding Now · #6 08-24-2013, 08:03 PM

Poor Bro. Gary........

Abiding Now · #7 08-24-2013, 08:05 PM

Well...who woulda thunk it............

Michael The Disciple · #8 08-24-2013, 09:21 PM

Quote:

I said this in post 40 of this thread.

Ok Reckert is really off on some things. In my opinion he is no worse and perhaps if he stops his anti YHWH crusade would be a more useful teacher than many Apostolics. At least he stands for something.

He has done a great job in exposing the preterists. I dont see anyone on here doing that mostly they are accepted if not down right praised. He exposes the pre trib error also.

Years ago he came in my Paltalk room a few times. He said he was with me until I began to speak on the "standards". Then he said I lost him.

Anyway Im just saying why is HE the only one who can be hated and ridiculed on this Forum? Everyday I see much false doctrine posted here and many people teach falsely on many things. So tho I do not follow Reckert and would not encourage anyone else to I cant say hes worse than many right here when it comes to teaching error.

One fellow on the Forum here has mocked YHWH and Yeshua many times and holds to the same standards as Reckert does and he is affectionately called "Elder" by many here. Hmmmm

If I read correctly between the lines I would guess that besides other foundational truth that Reckert teaches he also believes in the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead as opposed to immortal soul error to his credit.

Someone correct me if Im wrong about that. I think he winds up destroying peoples confidence in the scriptures and that is a serious sin.

And to ridicule the LORD.....YHWH is very, very, scary.

Michael The Disciple · #9 08-25-2013, 03:40 AM

I was once led to believe that Reckart believes in soul sleep and the annihilation of the wicked. I have been looking at his studies tonight and find nothing about dead saints being alive in Heaven.

He always (in studies I looked at) points toward the dead being raised at the post trib rapture. Neither do I see any teaching about sinners being tormented for trillions of years in Hell. This seems like sound doctrine if indeed I am seeing his writings accurately.

Evang.Benincasa · #10 08-25-2013, 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael The Disciple

I was once led to believe that Reckart believes in soul sleep and the annihilation of the wicked. I have been looking at his studies tonight and find nothing about dead saints being alive in Heaven.

He always (in studies I looked at) points toward the dead being raised at the post trib rapture.

Neither do I see any teaching about sinners being tormented for trillions of years in Hell. This seems like sound doctrine if indeed I am seeing his writings accurately.

So are you saying that you were once led to believe that Brother Reckart didn't believe in sound doctrine concerning the state of the dead, but now since you have read his material further you believe his teachings are sound concerning the issues of judgement after death?