Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
I never said one word about you respecting what Romney said lol
And does that make him a worse choice than Obama?
I don't ask you to do anything.
Look at your facts, it's based on the "fact" that there are less gays, yet admits there are a LOT of Heterosexuals that are pedophiles.
And gay men often HIDE themselves behind a heterosexual marriage so keeping out gay men does not prevent pedophiles
BTW The BSs have had a LOT of pedophiles hit their ranks and get kicked out and rejoin somewhere else so having a policy against gays does not do anything
Who you gonna vote for?
|
Quote:
Homosexual Males are Sexually Attracted to Underage Boys
· A study in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that homosexual men are attracted to young males. The study compared the sexual age preferences of heterosexual men, heterosexual women, homosexual men, and lesbians. The results showed that, in marked contrast to the other three categories, "all but 9 of the 48 homosexual men preferred the youngest two male age categories," which included males as young as age fifteen.[36]
· Many pedophiles, in fact, consider themselves to be homosexual. A study of 229 convicted child molesters in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that "eighty-six percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual."[40]
http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=is02e3
|
Not having a policy would be worse. And I don't have to vote for anyone if I don't want to.
My point of view is that Romney affirms the organization can set it's own rules. He disagrees with those rules. What that means is that if he was making the rules, he would change them.
Taking that further, what that means is that if he becomes President, he can make decisions, he can veto or approve legislation, he can issue executive orders and he can nominate people who are like-minded in offices of influence.
Threaded Mode
