Texas: Clements now Armstrong - What gives?

[Esther]

Originally Posted by tstew

Apparently, his frozen B samples are routinely testing positive for EPOs. From my understanding, his argument against those is largely about statutes of limitations and the fact that they don't have the A samples to also test (since they were used up). Also some of the people who were now set to testify against him were credible witnesses who had no incentive to lie and who really had to be forced to.

I had not heard any had tested positive.