Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
This should be in the politics section.
Libya's attack was a well-thought out and planned assault on America's embassy, coiniciding with 9/11.
It was a Libya minority that carried out the attacks.
|
Of course but would it have happened under Qaddafi's watch?
Quote:
|
It was a group of Libyan's that pulled the Ambassador's body from the rubble and it was Libyans who were cheering when they realized he was alive still. It was a Libyan doctor that tried to save the Ambassaor's life.
|
Of course but would it have happened under Qaddafi's watch?
Quote:
It is the Libyan people who are also mourning the loss of our Ambassador.
The attack has very little to do with Obama's policies as much as it has to do with America in general.
|
Of course but would it have happened under Qaddafi's watch?
Quote:
|
Egypt's riots and the other riots are a knee-jerk reaction to a poorly made American flick attacking their prophet. How can we tie their response to Obama's policies? They react like this whenever anything is said about their prophet-- but to call him a homosexual and a pedophile and all the other insults were apparently too much truth for some to handle.
|
Of course but would it have happened under Mubarak's watch?
Quote:
|
They want to be upset. They want to protest? Fine. Freedom of speech is good but violence in these cases is ignorant.
|
Of course but would it have happened under Mubarak's watch?
Quote:
|
Why would anyone blame their ignorance on Obama?
|
Apparently the point went over your head
Quote:
|
Why isn't this thread n the political section?
|
Why are you here? You said you were leaving