Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamingZword
We have already encountered this argument before and we and other people consider those supossedly "Post- Apostolic Writtings" to be either spurious, lies or later alterations. It is well known that forgeries and alterations to ancient writtings were done quite frequently. so we are not impressed.
We are still on schedule for publication after a few more minor reviews.
If despite our best efforts to publish an error free version, we somehow do not quite succeed, we have always considered the posibility that we might publish a future Revised version, if we consider it necesary.
|
Just as an example, why do you consider the following spurious, lies or somehow later altered? Do you have any sort of proof for such a view?
Hippolytus (170-236 AD says in Fragments: Part II.-Dogmatical and Historical.--Against the Heresy of One Noetus, "gave this charge to the disciples after He rose from the dead: Go ye and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost."
Also, why did you keep the 'ye olde english' verbiage? What was the reasoning behind rejecting modern day language?
Threaded Mode
