Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The Fellowship Hall > Fellowship Hall
Facebook

Notices

Fellowship Hall The place to go for Fellowship & Fun!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 12-22-2012, 08:23 AM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Why Imply No Tongues = No Salvation?

Why do we not look for the appearance of cloven tongues, like as of fire?
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV

Last edited by Cindy; 12-22-2012 at 08:57 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 12-22-2012, 09:00 AM
Cindy's Avatar
Cindy Cindy is offline
Forever Loved Admin


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 26,537
Re: Why Imply No Tongues = No Salvation?

On the day of Pentecost they spoke with known tongues. They didn't need translators.
__________________
If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.
2 Chronicles 7:14 KJV

He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:8 KJV

Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 1 John 3:2 KJV
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 12-22-2012, 10:56 AM
Pressing-On's Avatar
Pressing-On Pressing-On is offline
Not riding the train


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
Re: Why Imply No Tongues = No Salvation?

Acts 2:4 says that they “spoke with other tongues”.

“Other”, in the Greek, means “different/altered/strange”. The multitude present understood their dialect, but the person’s speaking in tongues knew it as a language different than their own.

How do we know this? Because, it is the same today.

When the accounts concerning the infilling of the Holy Ghost say things like these references I have cited, there is no way I will try to say it is not and never has been the initial evidence of the infilling of the Holy Ghost. The evidence is too solid to be against it.

Acts 2:4 “And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues…”

Acts 2:33 "Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear."

2:9-11 “ Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, 10 Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, 11 Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our tongues the wonderful works of God.

Acts:2:45-46 “…because that on the Gentiles also was poured out the gift of the Holy Ghost. 46 For they heard them speak with tongues…”

Acts 10:47 "Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?"

Acts 19:6 “And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues…

I Cor 14:22Wherefore tongues are for a sign, not to them that believe, but to them that believe not:…”
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 12-22-2012, 12:03 PM
seekerman seekerman is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,406
Re: Why Imply No Tongues = No Salvation?

What can wash away my sin?
Nothing but the blood of Jesus;
What can make me whole again?
Nothing but the blood of Jesus.

Refrain

Oh! precious is the flow
That makes me white as snow;
No other fount I know,
Nothing but the blood of Jesus.

For my pardon, this I see,
Nothing but the blood of Jesus;
For my cleansing this my plea,
Nothing but the blood of Jesus.

Refrain

Nothing can for sin atone,
Nothing but the blood of Jesus;
Naught of good that I have done,
Nothing but the blood of Jesus.

Refrain

This is all my hope and peace,
Nothing but the blood of Jesus;
This is all my righteousness,
Nothing but the blood of Jesus.

Refrain

Now by this I’ll overcome—
Nothing but the blood of Jesus,
Now by this I’ll reach my home—
Nothing but the blood of Jesus.

Refrain

Glory! Glory! This I sing—
Nothing but the blood of Jesus,
All my praise for this I bring—
Nothing but the blood of Jesus.

Refrain
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 12-22-2012, 12:22 PM
Dordrecht's Avatar
Dordrecht Dordrecht is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,580
Re: Why Imply No Tongues = No Salvation?

Many here think it should be like this:



What can wash away my sin?
Nothing but my uncut hair,;
What can make me whole again?
Nothing but my long skirts.



Oh! precious is the flow
That makes me white as snow;
No other fount I know,
Nothing but the speaking in tongues.

For my pardon, this I see,
Nothing but my dress code;
For my cleansing this my plea,
Nothing but my little 6 year old boy,
with a 2 piece suit and tie.
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 12-22-2012, 12:27 PM
seekerman seekerman is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,406
Re: Why Imply No Tongues = No Salvation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dordrecht View Post
Many here think it should be like this:



What can wash away my sin?
Nothing but my uncut hair,;
What can make me whole again?
Nothing but my long skirts.



Oh! precious is the flow
That makes me white as snow;
No other fount I know,
Nothing but the speaking in tongues.

For my pardon, this I see,
Nothing but my dress code;
For my cleansing this my plea,
Nothing but my little 6 year old boy,
with a 2 piece suit and tie.
Yes, that would be the oneness pentecostal version. An additional verse would read....

What can wash away my sins
what can make be whole again
what can redeem this sinful creature
nothing but the baptismal words of the preacher
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 12-22-2012, 12:51 PM
Old Paths's Avatar
Old Paths Old Paths is offline
Psalms 132:1


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,367
Re: Why Imply No Tongues = No Salvation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dordrecht View Post
Many here think it should be like this:



What can wash away my sin?
Nothing but my uncut hair,;
What can make me whole again?
Nothing but my long skirts.



Oh! precious is the flow
That makes me white as snow;
No other fount I know,
Nothing but the speaking in tongues.

For my pardon, this I see,
Nothing but my dress code;
For my cleansing this my plea,
Nothing but my little 6 year old boy,
with a 2 piece suit and tie.
Beautiful!

Thanks for sharing......
__________________



DOCTOR Old Paths for all your spiritual needs.


STILL believing the same after all these years
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 12-22-2012, 03:12 PM
rdp rdp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,667
Re: Why Imply No Tongues = No Salvation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson View Post
Jesus said that the believers would handle snakes.
Where is the insistence that we ALL handle snakes as part of passing through the birth canal of salvation?

Where is the insistence that we ALL drive out demons?

Where is the insistence that we ALL heal? Using Oneness logic, are we not "safe" until we lay our hands on someone who is sick and see that the Lord heals them?

But we insist that a person is not "safe" until the Lord confirms their new birth by speaking in tongues?

Doesn't anyone see the inconsistency in this?


In the New Testament, there is one person who plainly asks the question, "What must I do to be saved?"

Was the answer given incomplete?

According to many, yes Paul's recorded answer was incomplete and even inconsistent with the truth of God's Word. However, Paul's answer to the Phillipian jailer seems complete and consistent with all of the very plain scriptures related to salvation.
Jesus was prophesying of the church age in Mark 16.17...All of which we see fulfilled in Acts & in the daily affairs of believers.


Acts 2.37 was the first NT question relative to salvation. If the question is the same from the lips of guilty sinners, so is the answer given from the lips of the man w/ the keys to heaven.


And Peter said to them, “Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. For the promise is for you and for your children and for all who are far off, everyone whom the Lord our God calls to himself.” 40 And with many other words he bore witness and continued to exhort them, saying, “Save yourselves from this crooked generation.” So those who received his word were baptized, and there were added that day about three thousand souls.


The Philippian Jailer was a pagan in need of the knowledge of Jesus Christ & Paul was merely telling him to turn from his false gods to the True God "and you shall be saved, you and your household." If taken at face value devoid of context like you are doing, then the "belief" of the Philippian jailer would "save" his entire household!?


Moreover, there was no command from Paul for the jailer to Repent. Using the criteria offered above, can we now say that a person does not have to Repent of their sins to be saved....Or "was the answer given incomplete?"


The next verse states that they spoke the word of the Lord to him, he demonstrated signs of repentance by washing their stripes, was baptized within the hour (which means they directed him to do so), & had an experience which caused him to "rejoice greatly." The Greek verb translated "Rejoice(d)" in vs. 34 derives from the GK. #21 (See Strong's) & defines as "Properly, to Jump for Joy"!


The way the first person got into the NT church is the way the last person will get into the NT church. The way the first person was baptized is the way the last person will be baptized....& the way the first person received the Holy Spirit is the way the last person will receive the Holy Spirit!


"By one Spirit we were all baptized into one body."




Honestly hoping & praying you make the biblical decision....God Bless!
__________________
Rare is the Individual Found who is Genuinely in Search of Biblical Truth.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 12-23-2012, 08:22 PM
houston houston is offline
Isaiah 56:4-5


 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SOUTH ZION
Posts: 11,307
Re: Why Imply No Tongues = No Salvation?

Y'all had too much egg nog.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 12-23-2012, 08:30 PM
rdp rdp is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,667
Re: Why Imply No Tongues = No Salvation?

Quote:
Originally Posted by seekerman View Post
Yes, that would be the oneness pentecostal version. An additional verse would read....

What can wash away my sins
what can make be whole again
what can redeem this sinful creature
nothing but the baptismal words of the preacher
Actually, it would be the Bible version....Oughta' try it sometime instead of fighting it like a tiger !

It's quite liberating from the false doctrines propagated by Trinitarians !
__________________
Rare is the Individual Found who is Genuinely in Search of Biblical Truth.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Salvation is a Who, Not a What deacon blues Fellowship Hall 16 02-11-2011 09:23 AM
Speaking In Tongues Does Not Equal Salvation. Jermyn Davidson Fellowship Hall 361 08-25-2010 09:29 AM
Deceiving the Elect - "If it were possible." Does this imply pre-trib? OP_Carl Fellowship Hall 3 07-30-2007 04:01 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Amanah

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.