Why does Oneness deny Son as creator?

[Praxeas]

Originally Posted by Iron_Bladder

So are you claiming that there was a time when he wasn’t the SON? Doesn’t that mean that to you God has changed?

I am and have always been claiming that there was a time when God was NOT the Son in that God was NOT incarnate yet with a human nature. No that does not mean God changed because He is the same God, same person with the same unchanged Divine nature/essence he was before the incarnation as he is now. And I am getting tired of repeating that to you here. YOu have brought up this issue of God changing and we have already dragged it out. If God changed for me, then he changed for Trinitarians to when they say God was incarnate or the Son became a man