Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
When I read anti GZ stuff here and in the news and so far of the PROs case, it seems to be all based on emotion.
When you get emotional facts no longer matters and a search for truth goes out the door
|
Yeah after hearing a lot of simple facts in the case I was more on the self defense angle or at least reasonable doubt. And after reading some stuff from both sides, I'll admit there was some on the pro GZ side that came off kind of nutty and out in left field but for the most part there were people who was using laws, making sense and seemed vary rational.
On the anti GZ side I've heard some compelling arguments against a few inconsistencies in GZ statements and reenactment but nothing to really combat reasonable doubt and a lot more looked like conspiracy theories, wild accusations and jumping to crazy conclusions on the smallest of evidence.
Threaded Mode
